Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546]

被引:32
|
作者
Arts, MP [1 ]
Peul, WC
Brand, R
Koes, BW
Thomeer, RT
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Med Ctr Haaglanden, Dept Neurosurg, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-7-42
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Open discectomy is the standard surgical procedure in the treatment of patients with long-lasting sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. Minimally invasive approaches such as microendoscopic discectomy have gained attention in recent years. Reduced tissue trauma allows early ambulation, short hospital stay and quick resumption of daily activities. A comparative cost-effectiveness study has not been performed yet. We present the design of a randomised controlled trial on cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods/Design: Patients ( age 18 - 70 years) presenting with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation lasting more than 6 - 8 weeks are included. Patients with disc herniation larger than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter, or disc herniation less than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter with concomitant lateral recess stenosis or sequestration, are eliglible for participation. Randomisation into microendoscopic discectomy or conventional unilateral transflaval discectomy will take place in the operating room after induction of anesthesia. The length of skin incision is equal in both groups. The primary outcome measure is the functional assessment of the patient, measured by the Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, at 8 weeks and 1 year after surgery. We will also evaluate several other outcome parameters, including perceived recovery, leg and back pain, incidence of re-operations, complications, serum creatine kinase, quality of life, medical consumption, absenteeism and costs. The study is a randomised prospective multi-institutional trial, in which two surgical techniques are compared in a parallel group design. Patients and research nurses are kept blinded of the allocated treatment during the follow-up period of 2 years. Discussion: Currently, open discectomy is the golden standard in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Whether microendoscopic discectomy is more cost-effective than unilateral transflaval discectomy has to be determined by this trial.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation
    Qu, Yang
    Cheng, Meng
    Dong, Rongpeng
    Kang, Mingyang
    Zhou, Haohan
    Zhao, Jianwu
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 25 (03)
  • [32] Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Preliminary Analysis of L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Outcomes in Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials
    Liu, Yanting
    Kim, Youngjin
    Park, Chan Woong
    Suvithayasiri, Siravich
    Jitpakdee, Khanathip
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    NEUROSPINE, 2023, 20 (04) : 1457 - 1468
  • [33] Cost and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy versus Microscope-Assisted Tubular Discectomy for L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Qu, Ning
    Gong, Lingli
    Yang, Xinmin
    Fu, Jiaming
    Zhang, Bin
    Qi, Qihua
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 178 : E712 - E719
  • [34] Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial (vol 28, pg 300, 2018)
    Rong, Limin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (05) : 768 - 770
  • [35] Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microsurgical laminotomy: A prospective, randomized controlled trial of patients with lumbar disc herniation and lateral recess stenosis
    Kong, Lei
    Shang, Xi-Fu
    Zhang, Wen-Zhi
    Duan, Li-Qun
    Yu, Yang
    Ni, Wei-Jian
    Huang, Yan
    ORTHOPADE, 2019, 48 (02): : 157 - 164
  • [36] Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qin, Rongqing
    Liu, Baoshan
    Hao, Jie
    Zhou, Pin
    Yao, Yu
    Zhang, Feng
    Chen, Xiaoqing
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 120 : 352 - 362
  • [37] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery (REALISE): design of a randomised controlled trial
    Teddy Oosterhuis
    Maurits van Tulder
    Wilco Peul
    Judith Bosmans
    Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp
    Lidwien Smakman
    Mark Arts
    Raymond Ostelo
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [38] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery (REALISE): design of a randomised controlled trial
    Oosterhuis, Teddy
    van Tulder, Maurits
    Peul, Wilco
    Bosmans, Judith
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen
    Smakman, Lidwien
    Arts, Mark
    Ostelo, Raymond
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [39] Surgical technique and effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy for large uncontained lumbar disc herniations: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 8 years of follow-up
    Mohamed Hussein
    Ashraf Abdeldayem
    Mahmoud M. M. Mattar
    European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 1992 - 1999
  • [40] Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Pain, Disability, and Complication Rate-A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Meyer, Guilherme
    da Rocha, Ivan Dias
    Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca
    Marcon, Raphael Martus
    Coutinho, Thiago Pereira
    Torelli, Alessandro Gonzalez
    Petersen, Pedro Araujo
    Letaif, Olavo Biraghi
    Pessoa de Barros Filho, Tarcisio Eloy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (01): : 72 - 78