Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546]

被引:32
|
作者
Arts, MP [1 ]
Peul, WC
Brand, R
Koes, BW
Thomeer, RT
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Med Ctr Haaglanden, Dept Neurosurg, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-7-42
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Open discectomy is the standard surgical procedure in the treatment of patients with long-lasting sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. Minimally invasive approaches such as microendoscopic discectomy have gained attention in recent years. Reduced tissue trauma allows early ambulation, short hospital stay and quick resumption of daily activities. A comparative cost-effectiveness study has not been performed yet. We present the design of a randomised controlled trial on cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods/Design: Patients ( age 18 - 70 years) presenting with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation lasting more than 6 - 8 weeks are included. Patients with disc herniation larger than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter, or disc herniation less than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter with concomitant lateral recess stenosis or sequestration, are eliglible for participation. Randomisation into microendoscopic discectomy or conventional unilateral transflaval discectomy will take place in the operating room after induction of anesthesia. The length of skin incision is equal in both groups. The primary outcome measure is the functional assessment of the patient, measured by the Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, at 8 weeks and 1 year after surgery. We will also evaluate several other outcome parameters, including perceived recovery, leg and back pain, incidence of re-operations, complications, serum creatine kinase, quality of life, medical consumption, absenteeism and costs. The study is a randomised prospective multi-institutional trial, in which two surgical techniques are compared in a parallel group design. Patients and research nurses are kept blinded of the allocated treatment during the follow-up period of 2 years. Discussion: Currently, open discectomy is the golden standard in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Whether microendoscopic discectomy is more cost-effective than unilateral transflaval discectomy has to be determined by this trial.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the Outcomes of Microendoscopic Discectomy Versus Full-Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of L4/5 Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Fujita, Muneyoshi
    Inui, Takahiro
    Oshima, Yasushi
    Iwai, Hiroki
    Inanami, Hirohiko
    Koga, Hisashi
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (03) : 922 - 929
  • [22] PTED study: design of a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
    Seiger, Ankie
    Gadjradj, Pravesh S.
    Harhangi, Biswadjiet S.
    van Susante, Job L. C.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    de Boer, Michiel R.
    Rubinstein, Sidney M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [23] Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial
    Chen, Zihao
    Zhang, Liangming
    Dong, Jianwen
    Xie, Peigen
    Liu, Bin
    Wang, Qiyou
    Chen, Ruiqiang
    Feng, Feng
    Yang, Bu
    Shu, Tao
    Li, Shangfu
    Yang, Yang
    He, Lei
    Pang, Mao
    Rong, Limin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 28 (03) : 300 - 310
  • [24] Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation: Five-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chen, Zihao
    Zhang, Liangming
    Dong, Jianwen
    Xie, Peigen
    Liu, Bin
    Chen, Ruiqiang
    Li, Shangfu
    Liu, Zhongyu
    Yang, Bu
    Feng, Feng
    He, Lei
    Yang, Yang
    Pang, Mao
    Rong, Limin
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (02) : 79 - 88
  • [25] Clinical study of Microendoscopic Discectomy plus Fibrous Ring Suture Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy alone in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in young and middle-aged patients
    Cui, Hong-xun
    Wang, Yi-di
    Liu, Yong-hui
    Guo, Ma -long
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 40 (04) : 690 - 694
  • [26] Percutaneous full-endoscopic transforaminal discectomy versus open microdiscectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: randomized controlled trial
    Kandeel, Moustafa Mohamed
    Yousef, Magdy Gamal Abdel Kader
    Saoud, Abdelfattah Mohamed Fathy
    Abu-Elghait, Zakaria Hassan Ibrahim
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 60 (01):
  • [27] Percutaneous full-endoscopic transforaminal discectomy versus open microdiscectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: randomized controlled trial
    Moustafa Mohamed Kandeel
    Magdy Gamal Abdel Kader Yousef
    Abdelfattah Mohamed Fathy Saoud
    Zakaria Hassan Ibrahim Abu-Elghait
    The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 60
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of a Bone-anchored Annular Closure Device Versus Conventional Lumbar Discectomy in Treating Lumbar Disc Herniations
    Ament, Jared
    Thaci, Bart
    Yang, Zhuo
    Kulubya, Edwin
    Hsu, Wellington
    Bouma, Gerrit
    Kim, Kee D.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (01) : 5 - 16
  • [30] A comparative study on the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and conventional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
    Li, Zheng
    Jiang, Chen -yang
    Xu, Bao-shan
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 40 (03) : 297 - 302