Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546]

被引:32
|
作者
Arts, MP [1 ]
Peul, WC
Brand, R
Koes, BW
Thomeer, RT
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Med Ctr Haaglanden, Dept Neurosurg, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-7-42
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Open discectomy is the standard surgical procedure in the treatment of patients with long-lasting sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. Minimally invasive approaches such as microendoscopic discectomy have gained attention in recent years. Reduced tissue trauma allows early ambulation, short hospital stay and quick resumption of daily activities. A comparative cost-effectiveness study has not been performed yet. We present the design of a randomised controlled trial on cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods/Design: Patients ( age 18 - 70 years) presenting with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation lasting more than 6 - 8 weeks are included. Patients with disc herniation larger than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter, or disc herniation less than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter with concomitant lateral recess stenosis or sequestration, are eliglible for participation. Randomisation into microendoscopic discectomy or conventional unilateral transflaval discectomy will take place in the operating room after induction of anesthesia. The length of skin incision is equal in both groups. The primary outcome measure is the functional assessment of the patient, measured by the Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, at 8 weeks and 1 year after surgery. We will also evaluate several other outcome parameters, including perceived recovery, leg and back pain, incidence of re-operations, complications, serum creatine kinase, quality of life, medical consumption, absenteeism and costs. The study is a randomised prospective multi-institutional trial, in which two surgical techniques are compared in a parallel group design. Patients and research nurses are kept blinded of the allocated treatment during the follow-up period of 2 years. Discussion: Currently, open discectomy is the golden standard in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Whether microendoscopic discectomy is more cost-effective than unilateral transflaval discectomy has to be determined by this trial.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546]
    Mark P Arts
    Wilco C Peul
    Ronald Brand
    Bart W Koes
    Ralph TWM Thomeer
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7
  • [2] Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis
    He, JuLiang
    Xiao, ShanWen
    Wu, ZhenJie
    Yuan, ZhenChao
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (05) : 1373 - 1381
  • [3] Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis
    JuLiang He
    ShanWen Xiao
    ZhenJie Wu
    ZhenChao Yuan
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 1373 - 1381
  • [4] Effectiveness of percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation; design of a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Brouwer, Patrick A.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Brand, Ronald
    Arts, Mark P.
    Koes, Bart W.
    van den Berg, Annette A.
    van Buchem, Mark A.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2009, 10
  • [5] Effectiveness of percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation; design of a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Patrick A Brouwer
    Wilco C Peul
    Ronald Brand
    Mark P Arts
    Bart W Koes
    Annette A van den Berg
    Mark A van Buchem
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy versus endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation
    Choi, Kyung-Chul
    Shim, Hyeong-Ki
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Cha, Kyung Han
    Lee, Dong Chan
    Kim, Ea Ran
    Kim, Mee Jung
    Park, Choon-Keun
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (07): : 1162 - 1169
  • [7] A randomized study protocol of microendoscopic versus open discectomy in treatment of lumbar disc herniation
    Zhou, Yunlong
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Lei, Fei
    Xie, Kan
    Jia, Xufeng
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (31)
  • [8] Open fenestration discectomy versus microscopic fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial
    Sherwan A. Hamawandi
    Injam Ibrahim Sulaiman
    Ameer Kadhim Al-Humairi
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [9] Open fenestration discectomy versus microscopic fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial
    Hamawandi, Sherwan A.
    Sulaiman, Injam Ibrahim
    Al-Humairi, Ameer Kadhim
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [10] Full-Endoscopic Technique Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Li, Mao
    Yang, Huilin
    Yang, Qun
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (04) : 359 - 363