Meta-Analyses of Biosolids Effect in Dryland Wheat Agroecosystems

被引:7
|
作者
Barbarick, Kenneth [1 ]
Ippolito, James [1 ]
McDaniel, Jacob [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
关键词
NITROGEN; SOIL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2016.12.0470
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land application to cropping systems is USEPA's preferred method of recycling biosolids. Determination of biosolids effect size through meta-analyses from two decades of fieldlocation research at three sites should answer the question: Does 20 yr of biosolids application affect dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain production, grain nutrient concentrations, and soil elemental extractability compared with equivalent rates of commercial N fertilizer? At two sites, biennial biosolids application rates to a wheat-fallow (WF) rotation were up to 11.2 dry Mg ha(-1) and up to 112 kg commercial N fertilizer ha(-1), whereas rates at the third location varied to match soil-test information. Crop rotations included WF and wheat-corn (Zea mays L.)-fallow. We completed meta-analyses of biosolids effects compared with N fertilizer on wheat yield, grain protein, grain total, and soil ammonium bicarbonate-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (ABDTPA)-extractable P, Zn, Cu, Fe, and Ni concentrations at the aforementioned sites from 1993 through 2013. Results showed that biosolids produced greater grain P and Zn at one site. Biosolids rates at two sites resulted in greater grain Zn and ABDTPA P, Zn, Cu, and Fe. Meta-analyses tests for heterogeneity indicated that the variance for all sites and rates could be explained as consistent across treatments, whereas the test for the 20 yr showed that heterogeneity was large and other factors affected the variance (e. g., climatic variability between years). Meta-analysis showed the practical effect of biosolids over a 20-yr study and demonstrated that the primary biosolids effect was an improvement in Zn availability to wheat.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 460
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses
    Sutton, AJ
    Duval, SJ
    Tweedie, RL
    Abrams, KR
    Jones, DR
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7249): : 1574 - 1577
  • [42] A meta-analysis of meta-analyses
    Sigman, Mark
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [43] Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data
    Smith, Catrin Tudur
    Marcucci, Maura
    Nolan, Sarah J.
    Iorio, Alfonso
    Sudell, Maria
    Riley, Richard
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (09):
  • [44] Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data
    Catrin Tudur Smith
    James Oyee
    Maura Marcucci
    Maroeska Rovers
    Alfonso Iorio
    Richard Riley
    Paula Williamson
    Mike Clarke
    Trials, 12 (Suppl 1)
  • [45] The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses
    Atal, Ignacio
    Porcher, Raphael
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Ravaud, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 111 : 32 - 40
  • [46] Are we capable of separating the wheat from the chaff when assessing meta-analyses?
    Correia, M. Isabel T. D.
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2020, 39 (03) : 705 - 707
  • [47] METHODOLOGY STANDARDS IN META-ANALYSES
    Markiewicz, Michael R.
    Arce, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (01) : 235 - 236
  • [48] Meta-analyses of diagnostic studies
    Cleophas, Ton J.
    Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 47 (11) : 1351 - 1354
  • [49] The Heterogeneity of PET Meta-Analyses
    Williamson, J. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [50] Meta-analyses: what is heterogeneity?
    Sedgwick, Philip
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350