Meta-Analyses of Biosolids Effect in Dryland Wheat Agroecosystems

被引:7
|
作者
Barbarick, Kenneth [1 ]
Ippolito, James [1 ]
McDaniel, Jacob [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
关键词
NITROGEN; SOIL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2016.12.0470
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land application to cropping systems is USEPA's preferred method of recycling biosolids. Determination of biosolids effect size through meta-analyses from two decades of fieldlocation research at three sites should answer the question: Does 20 yr of biosolids application affect dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain production, grain nutrient concentrations, and soil elemental extractability compared with equivalent rates of commercial N fertilizer? At two sites, biennial biosolids application rates to a wheat-fallow (WF) rotation were up to 11.2 dry Mg ha(-1) and up to 112 kg commercial N fertilizer ha(-1), whereas rates at the third location varied to match soil-test information. Crop rotations included WF and wheat-corn (Zea mays L.)-fallow. We completed meta-analyses of biosolids effects compared with N fertilizer on wheat yield, grain protein, grain total, and soil ammonium bicarbonate-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (ABDTPA)-extractable P, Zn, Cu, Fe, and Ni concentrations at the aforementioned sites from 1993 through 2013. Results showed that biosolids produced greater grain P and Zn at one site. Biosolids rates at two sites resulted in greater grain Zn and ABDTPA P, Zn, Cu, and Fe. Meta-analyses tests for heterogeneity indicated that the variance for all sites and rates could be explained as consistent across treatments, whereas the test for the 20 yr showed that heterogeneity was large and other factors affected the variance (e. g., climatic variability between years). Meta-analysis showed the practical effect of biosolids over a 20-yr study and demonstrated that the primary biosolids effect was an improvement in Zn availability to wheat.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 460
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pitfalls of meta-analyses
    Barber, JP
    Milrod, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (06): : 1131 - 1131
  • [22] Mistakes with meta-analyses
    Grant, JM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07): : R9 - R9
  • [23] Limitations of Meta-Analyses
    Dido Green
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2012, 42 : 1774 - 1775
  • [24] Limitations of Meta-Analyses
    Green, Dido
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2012, 42 (08) : 1774 - 1775
  • [25] Meta-analyses (QUOROM)
    Urrutia, Gerard
    Tort, Sera
    Bonfill, Xavier
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2005, 125 : 32 - 37
  • [26] Dueling meta-analyses
    Wears, RL
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 36 (03) : 234 - 236
  • [27] Disputed Meta-Analyses
    Look, M. P.
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 107 (13): : 224 - 225
  • [28] Improving Meta-analyses
    Sant'Anna, Fernando Mendes
    Sant'Anna, Mariana Bonacossa
    Sant'Anna, Lucas Bonacossa
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 120 (06)
  • [29] Megatrials and meta-analyses
    Carné, X
    METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 23 (06): : 289 - 289
  • [30] Reality and meta-analyses
    Machtay, M
    Kaiser, LR
    Glatstein, E
    CHEST, 2000, 118 (03) : 835 - 836