The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: an examination into the cultural validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30

被引:95
|
作者
Guzelant, A
Goksel, T
Ozkok, S
Tasbakan, S
Aysan, T
Bottomley, A
机构
[1] Izmir Konak Dist Hlth Directorate, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ Med Sch, Dept Chest Dis, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Ege Univ Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, Izmir, Turkey
[4] EORTC Qual Life Unit, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
EORTC QLQ-C30; lung cancer; Karnofsky; Turkish version; validation; reliability;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2354.2003.00435.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Turkish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire version 2.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v.2.0) has started to be used in clinical trials recently. The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 v.2.0 and the correlation between the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the EORTC QLQ-C30. Two hundred and two lung cancer patients were included in the study between January and March 2000. All the subscales met the minimal standards of reliability (Cronbach's alpha greater than or equal to 0.70). Only the role functioning scale differed among the three disease stages of patients (local, locoregional and metastatic). There was no statistically significant difference among therapy types. All interscale correlations were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The strongest correlations were found among the physical functioning, role functioning and fatigue scales. Social functioning was closely related with physical, role, emotional and cognitive functioning. The weakest correlations were between nausea/vomiting and the other scales. Global quality of life (QOL) was substantially correlated with most of the scales except cognitive functioning. The coefficients for the correlation between the items differed between 0.12 and 0.97 and all the subscales were strongly correlated with the scales which they formed. The highest correlation between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and KPS was for physical functioning (r = 0.62, P < 0.05). The Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 is a valid (by means of interscales validity) and reliable instrument for Turkish lung cancer patients and can be used in clinical studies but needs supporting by the reference data on the QOL of the Turkish population.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 144
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A cross-validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancer
    Kobayashi, K
    Takeda, F
    Teramukai, S
    Gotoh, I
    Sakai, H
    Yoneda, S
    Noguchi, Y
    Ogasawara, H
    Yoshida, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (06) : 810 - 815
  • [2] Understanding the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Turkish cancer patients
    Cankurtaran, E. S.
    Ozalp, E.
    Soygur, H.
    Ozer, S.
    Akbiyik, D. I.
    Bottomley, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2008, 17 (01) : 98 - 104
  • [3] The Portuguese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30
    Ferreira, P
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL MEETING OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, : 527 - 532
  • [4] Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 Questionnaires
    Jassim, Ghufran
    AlAnsari, Ahmed
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2020, 16 : 3045 - 3052
  • [5] Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30
    Y.H. Yun
    Y.S. Park
    E.S. Lee
    S.-M. Bang
    D.S. Heo
    S.Y. Park
    C.H. You
    K. West
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2004, 13 : 863 - 868
  • [6] Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30
    Yun, YH
    Park, YS
    Lee, E
    Bang, SM
    Heo, DS
    Park, SY
    You, CH
    West, K
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (04) : 863 - 868
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in palliative care cancer patients
    Jocham, Hubert R.
    Dassen, Theo
    Widdershoven, Guy
    Halfens, Ruud
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 4 (03): : 348 - 357
  • [8] Validity of the QLQ-C30 in psychological research
    Determann, MM
    Kollenbaum, VE
    Henne-Bruns, D
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2003, 12 (08) : 836 - 836
  • [9] Clinimetrics: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire
    Granger, Catherine L.
    Cavalheri, Vinicius
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2022, 68 (02) : 146 - 146
  • [10] The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation study of the Thai version
    Silpakit, C
    Sirilerttrakul, S
    Jirajarus, M
    Sirisinha, T
    Sirachainan, E
    Ratanatharathorn, V
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (01) : 167 - 172