The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: an examination into the cultural validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30

被引:96
|
作者
Guzelant, A
Goksel, T
Ozkok, S
Tasbakan, S
Aysan, T
Bottomley, A
机构
[1] Izmir Konak Dist Hlth Directorate, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ Med Sch, Dept Chest Dis, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Ege Univ Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, Izmir, Turkey
[4] EORTC Qual Life Unit, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
EORTC QLQ-C30; lung cancer; Karnofsky; Turkish version; validation; reliability;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2354.2003.00435.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Turkish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire version 2.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v.2.0) has started to be used in clinical trials recently. The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 v.2.0 and the correlation between the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the EORTC QLQ-C30. Two hundred and two lung cancer patients were included in the study between January and March 2000. All the subscales met the minimal standards of reliability (Cronbach's alpha greater than or equal to 0.70). Only the role functioning scale differed among the three disease stages of patients (local, locoregional and metastatic). There was no statistically significant difference among therapy types. All interscale correlations were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The strongest correlations were found among the physical functioning, role functioning and fatigue scales. Social functioning was closely related with physical, role, emotional and cognitive functioning. The weakest correlations were between nausea/vomiting and the other scales. Global quality of life (QOL) was substantially correlated with most of the scales except cognitive functioning. The coefficients for the correlation between the items differed between 0.12 and 0.97 and all the subscales were strongly correlated with the scales which they formed. The highest correlation between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and KPS was for physical functioning (r = 0.62, P < 0.05). The Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 is a valid (by means of interscales validity) and reliable instrument for Turkish lung cancer patients and can be used in clinical studies but needs supporting by the reference data on the QOL of the Turkish population.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 144
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Translation and Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 into Indonesian Version for Cancer Patients in Indonesia
    Perwitasari, Dyah Aryani
    Atthobari, Jarir
    Dwiprahasto, Iwan
    Hakimi, Mohammad
    Gelderblom, Hans
    Putter, Hein
    Nortier, Johan W. R.
    Guchelaar, Henk-Jan
    Kaptein, Ad A.
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 41 (04) : 519 - 529
  • [32] Evaluation of reliability and validity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, Albanian version) among breast cancer patients from Kosovo
    Shuleta-Qehaja, Selvete
    Sterjev, Zoran
    Shuturkova, Ljubica
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2015, 9 : 459 - 465
  • [33] Content validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 for use in cancer
    Cocks, Kim
    Wells, Jane R.
    Johnson, Colin
    Schmidt, Heike
    Koller, Michael
    Oerlemans, Simone
    Velikova, Galina
    Pinto, Monica
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Exall, Elizabeth
    Finbow, Chelsea
    Fitzsimmons, Deborah
    Grant, Laura
    Groenvold, Mogens
    Tolley, Chloe
    Wheelwright, Sally
    Bottomley, Andrew
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 178 : 128 - 138
  • [34] TRANSLATION AND VALIDATION OF EORTC QLQ-C30 INTO INDONESIAN VERSION FOR CANCER PATIENTS IN INDONESIA
    Perwitasari, D. A.
    Atthobari, J.
    Dwiprahasto, I
    Hakimi, M.
    Gelderblom, H.
    Nortier, J. W. R.
    Guchelaar, H. J.
    Kaptein, A. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A515 - A515
  • [35] Test–Retest Reliability of an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30
    J. Jason Lundy
    Stephen Joel Coons
    Neil K. Aaronson
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2015, 8 : 165 - 170
  • [36] Testing psychometric properties of the standard Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
    Zhao, H
    Kanda, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (06) : 193 - 203
  • [37] Evidence for the content validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30: review of existing data
    Cocks, Kim
    Tolley, Chloe
    Grant, Laura
    Wheelwright, Sally
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof
    Groenvold, Mogens
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Fitzsimmons, Deborah
    Velikova, Galina
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Johnson, Colin
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 67 - 68
  • [38] Qualitative evidence on the content validity of EORTC QLQ-C30: Initial findings
    Cocks, Kim
    Tolley, Chloe
    Grant, Laura
    Wells, Jane
    Wheelwright, Sally
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof
    Gronvold, Mogens
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Fitzsimmons, Deborah
    Velikova, Galina
    Oerlemans, Simone
    Pinto, Monica
    Johnson, Colin
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S50 - S51
  • [39] The validity of EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue scale in advanced cancer patients and cancer survivors
    Knobel, H
    Loge, JH
    Brenne, E
    Fayers, P
    Hjermstad, MJ
    Kaasa, S
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 17 (08) : 664 - 672
  • [40] Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer
    D. Osoba
    N. Aaronson
    B. Zee
    M. Sprangers
    A. te Velde
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 1997, 6 (2) : 103 - 108