The effects of pressure treatment on the flamelet modeling of supersonic combustion

被引:18
|
作者
Ladeinde, Foluso [1 ]
Lou, Zhipeng [1 ]
Li, Wenhai [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Mech Engn, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] TTC Technol Inc, 2100 Middle Country Rd, Centereach, NY 11720 USA
关键词
Supersonic combustion; Laminar flamelet; Turbulence-combustion interaction; Pressure scaling; Seven-level pressure; Scramjet engine combustor; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; TURBULENCE; ADVECTION; REGIMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.03.030
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The flamelet method has been used extensively as an affordable turbulence-combustion interaction model that obviates the need to solve the evolution equations for the species mass fractions during a large-eddy or Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes calculation of a reactive flow field, leading to substantial savings in the simulation time and enabling modeling with relatively complex kinetic mechanisms. The canonical problem analyzed and stored in a look-up array in the flamelet procedure usually assumes some baseline fields; in particular, the pressure is often specified at a fixed value that is characteristic of the examined configuration. However, pressure in supersonic combustion has significant dynamical roles, unlike in low-Mach number or incompressible flows, and a constant pressure field will not be adequate for the former. To remedy this problem, reaction rate in the combustor is often assumed to scale squarely with pressure. This approach, which is probably acceptable for low-speed, high pressure combustors, is not suitable for dealing with the variable pressure conditions in supersonic combustion. This paper focuses on the assessment of the aforementioned scaling, in absolute sense, and also relative to an approach where pressure is added as a control parameter in the flamelet library. To achieve this, three classes of reactive systems with different levels of modeling complexities are investigated to show that representative chemical variables do not scale squarely with pressure. For the case of supersonic combustion, the scaling treatment in general leads to over-prediction of pressure and combustion and also tends to stabilize the flame. To the knowledge of the authors, no previous studies have reported on the issues addressed in the present paper. (C) 2019 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 429
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Supersonic Combustion Modeling and Simulation on General Platforms
    Huang, Shizhuo
    Chen, Qian
    Cheng, Yuwei
    Xian, Jinyu
    Tai, Zhengqi
    [J]. AEROSPACE, 2022, 9 (07)
  • [42] Modeling of supercritical-pressure turbulent combustion of hydrocarbon fuels using a modified flamelet-progress-variable approach
    Huang, Dongxin
    Wang, Qiuxiao
    Meng, Hua
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 119 : 472 - 480
  • [43] Effects of sawtooth grooves on supersonic combustion
    Zhang, Lan
    Sheng, Zhi-qiang
    Dan, Yu
    [J]. AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 136
  • [44] Study on the application of artificial neural network-based flamelet/progress variable model in supersonic combustion
    Lian, Chengyue
    Tang, Tao
    Wang, Hongbo
    Yu, Jiangfei
    Sun, Mingbo
    Xiong, Dapeng
    Yang, Yixin
    [J]. AIP ADVANCES, 2023, 13 (11)
  • [45] Evaluation of flamelet/progress variable model for the applications in supersonic combustion using hybrid RANS/LES approach
    Tang, Tao
    Wang, Hongbo
    Sun, Mingbo
    Zhao, Guoyan
    Yu, Jiangfei
    Fan, Zhouqin
    Wang, Zhenguo
    [J]. AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 126
  • [46] Flamelet analysis of turbulent combustion
    Bastiaans, RJM
    Martin, SM
    Pitsch, H
    van Oijen, JA
    de Goey, LPH
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2005, PT 3, 2005, 3516 : 64 - 71
  • [47] Quasi-one-dimensional modeling of pressure effects in supersonic nozzles
    Maicke, Brian A.
    Bondarev, George
    [J]. AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 70 : 161 - 169
  • [48] Combustion of residual steel gases: laminar flame analysis and turbulent flamelet modeling
    Gicquel, O
    Vervisch, L
    Joncquet, G
    Labegorre, B
    Darabiha, N
    [J]. FUEL, 2003, 82 (08) : 983 - 991
  • [49] Flamelet LES modeling of coal combustion with detailed devolatilization by directly coupled CPD
    Rieth, M.
    Clements, A. G.
    Rabacal, M.
    Proch, F.
    Stein, O. T.
    Kempf, A. M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2017, 36 (02) : 2181 - 2189
  • [50] Conditionally averaged balance equations for modeling premixed turbulent combustion in flamelet regime
    Lipatnikov, A. N.
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2008, 152 (04) : 529 - 547