Estimates of species extinctions from species-area relationships strongly depend on ecological context

被引:25
|
作者
Matias, Miguel G. [1 ,2 ]
Gravel, Dominique [3 ]
Guilhaumon, Francois [2 ]
Desjardins-Proulx, Philippe [3 ,4 ]
Loreau, Michel [5 ]
Muenkemueller, Tamara [6 ]
Mouquet, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Inst Sci Evolut, UMR 5554, FR-34095 Montpellier 05, France
[2] Univ Evora, CIBIO, P-7000890 Evora, Portugal
[3] Univ Quebec Rimouski, Dept Biol Chim & Geog, Rimouski, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Biol, Quebec Ctr Biodivers Sci, Montreal, PQ H3A 1B1, Canada
[5] Ctr Natl Rech Sci, Ctr Biodivers Theory & Modelling, Expt Ecol Stn, FR-09200 Moulis, France
[6] Univ Grenoble 1, CNRS, Lab Ecol Alpine, UMR 5553, FR-38041 Grenoble 9, France
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
HABITAT LOSS; BIODIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; RATES; RESPONSES; MODELS; NICHE; BIRDS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00448.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Species-area (SAR) and endemics-area (EAR) relationships are amongst the most common methods used to forecast species loss resulting from habitat loss. One critical, albeit often ignored, limitation of these area-based estimates is their disregard of the ecological context that shapes species distributions. In this study, we estimate species loss using a spatially explicit mechanistic simulation model to evaluate three important aspects of ecological context: coexistence mechanisms (e.g. species sorting, competition-colonization tradeoffs and neutral dynamics), spatial distribution of environmental conditions, and spatial pattern of habitat loss. We found that 1) area-based estimates of extinctions are sensitive to coexistence mechanisms as well as to the pattern of environmental heterogeneity; 2) there is a strong interaction between coexistence mechanisms and the pattern of habitat loss; 3) SARs always yield higher estimates of species loss than do EARs; and 4) SARs and EARs consistently underestimate the realized species loss. Our results highlight the need to integrate ecological mechanisms in area-estimates of species loss.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 442
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Species-area relationships arise from interaction of habitat heterogeneity and species pool
    Kolasa, J.
    Manne, L. L.
    Pandit, S. N.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2012, 685 (01) : 135 - 144
  • [22] The impact of the species-area relationship on estimates of paleodiversity
    Barnosky, AD
    Carrasco, MA
    Davis, EB
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2005, 3 (08) : 1356 - 1361
  • [23] Species-area relationships of butterflies in Europe and species richness forecasting
    Ulrich, W
    Buszko, J
    ECOGRAPHY, 2003, 26 (03) : 365 - 373
  • [24] A Grinnellian Niche Perspective on Species-Area Relationships
    Soberon, Jorge
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2019, 194 (06): : 760 - 775
  • [25] Scale-dependence in species-area relationships
    Turner, WR
    Tjorve, E
    ECOGRAPHY, 2005, 28 (06) : 721 - 730
  • [26] Species-area relationships underestimate extinction rates
    Fattorini, Simone
    Borges, Paulo A. V.
    ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2012, 40 : 27 - 30
  • [27] A barrier island perspective on species-area relationships
    Scherber, Christoph
    Andert, Hagen
    Niedringhaus, Rolf
    Tscharntke, Teja
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (24): : 12879 - 12889
  • [28] A global model of island species-area relationships
    Matthews, Thomas J.
    Rigal, Francois
    Triantis, Kostas A.
    Whittaker, Robert J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (25) : 12337 - 12342
  • [29] The importance of samples and isolates for species-area relationships
    Tjorve, Even
    Turner, Will R.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2009, 32 (03) : 391 - 400
  • [30] Weed species-area relationships as influenced by tillage
    Mulugeta, D
    Stoltenberg, DE
    Boerboom, CM
    WEED SCIENCE, 2001, 49 (02) : 217 - 223