Species-area relationships of butterflies in Europe and species richness forecasting

被引:43
|
作者
Ulrich, W [1 ]
Buszko, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Nicholas Copernicus Univ, Dept Anim Ecol, PL-87100 Torun, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03441.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Species-area relationships (SARs) of European butterfly species (Rhopalocera) appear to follow power functions with Mediterranean butterflies having a much higher slope value (z = 0.49) compared to the slope for the northern and eastern European countries (z = 0.10). A simulated process of species extinction by a stepwise density dependent random elimination of species affected species-area patterns differently. For Mediterranean countries SAR slopes decreased, for other European countries slopes increased during the extinction process. Comparisons of species numbers before and after extinction with those predicted by a classical SAR approach differed widely and revealed that SARs are not able to predict future species numbers at local scales. For Mediterranean countries the classical SAR approach underestimated the number of species remaining after simulated extinction, for all other European countries SARs highly overestimated species numbers. These contrasting patterns indicate that changes in SAR patterns do not unequivocally point to changes in species diversity or community structure as assumed by current theory. On the other hand, the results strongly indicate that simplified applications of SARs for forecasting might give misimpressions about species loss and future biodiversity if the initial community structure, especially relative densities and numbers of species with restricted range size, are not taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 373
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimizing Species Richness in Mosaic Landscapes: A Probabilistic Model of Species-Area Relationships
    Olsson, Ola
    Brady, Mark V.
    Stjernman, Martin
    Smith, Henrik G.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2021, 2
  • [2] Hawai'i's Toxic Plants: Species Richness and Species-Area Relationships
    Grayson, Donald K.
    Lennstrom, Heidi A.
    [J]. PACIFIC SCIENCE, 2022, 76 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [3] SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIPS
    MILLER, RI
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1984, 28 (02) : 181 - 182
  • [4] Taxonomic and regional uncertainty in species-area relationships and the identification of richness hotspots
    Guilhaumon, Francois
    Gimenez, Olivier
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Mouillot, David
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (40) : 15458 - 15463
  • [5] AN ASSESSMENT OF SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIPS
    USHER, MB
    WOOLHOUSE, MEJ
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (04) : 1100 - 1100
  • [6] Species-Area Relationships Are Controlled by Species Traits
    Franzen, Markus
    Schweiger, Oliver
    Betzholtz, Per-Eric
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05):
  • [7] Species richness, species-area curves and Simpson's paradox
    Scheiner, SM
    Cox, SB
    Willig, M
    Mittelbach, GG
    Osenberg, C
    Kaspari, M
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2000, 2 (06) : 791 - 802
  • [8] Richness and composition of oasis bird communities: Spatial issues and species-area relationships
    Selmi, S
    Boulinier, T
    Barbault, R
    [J]. AUK, 2002, 119 (02): : 533 - 539
  • [9] Detecting biodiversity hotspots using species-area and endemics-area relationships: the case of butterflies
    Ulrich, W
    Buszko, J
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2005, 14 (08) : 1977 - 1988
  • [10] Accounting for geographical variation in species-area relationships improves the prediction of plant species richness at the global scale
    Gerstner, Katharina
    Dormann, Carsten F.
    Vaclavik, Tomas
    Kreft, Holger
    Seppelt, Ralf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 41 (02) : 261 - 273