Detection of simulated chest lesions by using soft-copy reading: Comparison of an amorphous silicon flat-panel-detector system and a storage-phosphor system

被引:20
|
作者
Goo, JM
Im, JG
Lee, HJ
Chung, MJ
Seo, JB
Kim, HY
Lee, YJ
Kang, JW
Kim, JH
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Chongno Gu, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] SNUMRC, Inst Radiat Med, Clin Res Inst, Chongno Gu, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Eulgi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Goyang, South Korea
关键词
phantoms; radiography; comparative studies; digital; flat panel; thorax;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2241011441
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare observer performance by using soft-copy images produced by an amorphous silicon flat-panel- detector system and a storage-phosphor system for the detection of simulated chest lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To test the diagnostic performance of these two systems, four types of simulated lesions (nodules, micronodules, lines, and reticular opacities) were superimposed over an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Digital chest radiographs were acquired with amorphous silicon flat-panel-detector (3-K [K = 1,000] matrix, 12 bits) and storage-phosphor radiography (4-K matrix, 10 bits). Six board-certified radiologists evaluated soft-copy images on a high-resolution video monitor (2,048 X 2,560 X 8 bits). A total of 14,400 observations were analyzed in terms of receiver operating characteristics. RESULTS: Average performance in terms of nodule detection was significantly better (P <.05) with the flat-panel- detector system than with the storage-phosphor system. For micronodules, lines, and reticular opacities, no significant detection differences in averaged performance were found between the two detector systems. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of soft-copy images, the amorphous silicon detector system appears to be superior to the storage-phosphor system for the detection of pulmonary nodules. (C) RSNA 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 246
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: Comparison of soft-copy images
    Goo, JM
    Im, JG
    Kim, JH
    Seo, JB
    Kim, TS
    Shine, SJ
    Lee, W
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (04) : 1013 - 1018
  • [2] Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen-film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinorna lesions using hard copy images
    Ono, K
    Yoshitake, T
    Akahane, K
    Yamada, Y
    Maeda, T
    Kai, M
    Kusama, T
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (934): : 922 - 927
  • [3] Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: Storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography
    Kim, TS
    Im, JG
    Goo, JM
    Lee, KH
    Lee, YJ
    Kim, SH
    Kim, S
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (03) : 695 - 701
  • [4] Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: Comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography
    Ludwig, K
    Lenzen, H
    Kamm, KF
    Link, TM
    Diederich, S
    Wormanns, D
    Heindel, W
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (02) : 453 - 459
  • [5] Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography
    Karl Ludwig
    Andreas Henschel
    Thomas M. Bernhardt
    Horst Lenzen
    Dag Wormanns
    Stefan Diederich
    Walter Heindel
    [J]. European Radiology, 2003, 13 : 1316 - 1323
  • [6] Performance of a new digital flat-panel detector system in the detection of simulated rheumathoid erosions: A comparison with a speed class 200 screen-film system, a mammography screen-film system and a storage-phosphor system at different levels of exposure
    Ludwig, K
    Henschel, A
    Bernhardt, T
    Lenzen, H
    Wormanns, D
    Diederich, S
    Heindel, W
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2002, 4682 : 423 - 426
  • [7] Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography
    Ludwig, K
    Henschel, A
    Bernhardt, TM
    Lenzen, H
    Wormanns, D
    Diederich, S
    Heindel, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (06) : 1316 - 1323
  • [8] Performance of a flat-panel detector system in the depiction of anatomic details of the lumbar spine in Cynomolgus Monkeys: Comparison to a screen-film and a storage-phosphor system using different exposure doses
    Ludwig, K
    Ahlers, K
    Diederich, S
    Bernhardt, TM
    Freund, M
    Heindel, WL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 642 - 642
  • [9] The influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for the detection of interstitial lung markings on both storage phosphor and flat-panel-detector chest radiography
    Sung, Yon Mi
    Chung, Myung Jin
    Lee, Kyung Soo
    Choe, Bong-Keun
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 74 (01) : 275 - 279
  • [10] A digital flat-panel detector system in low-dose radiography of the pelvis in children evaluated for developmental dysplasia of the hip: Comparison to storage-phosphor radiography
    Ludwig, K
    Ahlers, K
    Kloska, SP
    Vieth, V
    Heindel, WL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 379 - 380