Temporal and geospatial trends in male factor infertility with assisted reproductive technology in the United States from 1999-2010

被引:25
|
作者
Odisho, Anobel Y. [1 ]
Nangia, Ajay K. [2 ]
Katz, Patricia P. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Smith, James F. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Male factor infertility; prevalence; geospatial mapping; GIS; health services; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of male factor infertility diagnosis within the context of assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics and its geographic and temporal distribution from 1999-2010. Design: Population study based on patients presenting for care at ART centers. Setting: Clinics providing ART services. Patient(s): All male patients seeking infertility care at ART clinics. Intervention(s): Data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, analyzed, geocoded, and mapped. Main Outcome Measure(s): Prevalence of male factor infertility diagnosis in a couple seeking infertility care. Result(s): Between 1999 and 2010, 1,057,402 cycles of ART using nonfrozen, nondonor eggs were performed, increasing from 62,809 cycles in 1999 to 99,289 cycles in 2010. Nationwide in ART clinics, the period prevalence of isolated male factor infertility was 17.1% and the prevalence of overall male factor infertility diagnoses was 34.6%. The highest prevalence was reported in New Mexico (56.4%) and lowest in Mississippi (24.2%). Conclusion(s): The prevalence of male factor infertility diagnosis varies significantly by time and space within the United States, whereas its overall prevalence has remained remarkably stable. This study provides the spatial analytic framework for future research to explore factors associated with male factor infertility. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to and Outcomes of Infertility Treatment and Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States
    Beroukhim, Gabriela
    Seifer, David B.
    [J]. ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 52 (04) : 659 - 675
  • [32] Average Annual Death Rates from Drowning, by Sex and Age Group - United States, 1999-2010
    Xu, Jiaquan
    [J]. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2013, 62 (34): : 706 - 706
  • [33] Endometriosis and Assisted Reproductive Technology: United States Trends and Outcomes 2000-2011
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Crawford, Sara
    Session, Donna R.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (06) : 1537 - 1543
  • [34] Trends in Resistance to Carbapenems and Third-Generation Cephalosporins among Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in the United States, 1999-2010
    Braykov, Nikolay P.
    Eber, Michael R.
    Klein, Eili Y.
    Morgan, Daniel J.
    Laxminarayan, Ramanan
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03): : 259 - 268
  • [35] Studies on sperm chromosomes in patients with severe male factor infertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment
    Levron, J
    Aviram-Goldring, A
    Madgar, I
    Raviv, G
    Barkai, G
    Dor, J
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2001, 183 : S23 - S28
  • [36] NATIONAL STUDY OF FACTORS INFLUENCING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART) OUTCOMES WITH MALE FACTOR INFERTILITY.
    Nangia, A. K.
    Luke, B.
    Megid, W. Abdel
    Smith, J. F.
    Mak, W.
    Stern, J. E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S33 - S33
  • [37] Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States
    Jain, T
    Missmer, SA
    Hornstein, MD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (16): : 1639 - 1645
  • [38] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1996 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry
    Bustillo, M
    Yee, B
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (05) : 798 - 807
  • [39] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry
    Kornafel, Kathleen L.
    Ho, Minh N.
    Henderson, Simon R.
    Sgarlata, Carmelo S.
    Koopersmith, Tina
    Cowart, Catherine L.
    Riggall, Frank C.
    Pabon, Julio E.
    Jabamoni, Reena
    Levrant, Seth
    Ying, Yu-Kang
    Nash, Lillian D.
    Husami, Nabil
    Bennett, Henry G.
    Beauchamp, Pedro J.
    Brumley, Harold W.
    Youngkin, Jeffrey
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (06) : 1253 - 1266
  • [40] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry
    Zeitz, J
    McNamee, P
    Toner, JP
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (01) : 18 - 31