Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States

被引:105
|
作者
Jain, T
Missmer, SA
Hornstein, MD
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Epidemiol Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2004年 / 350卷 / 16期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMsa032073
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: During the past decade in the United States, increasing attention has been paid to lowering the incidence of multiple gestations resulting from the use of assisted reproductive technology. To determine whether such efforts have been successful, we assessed national trends in embryo-transfer practice patterns and in outcomes after the use of assisted reproductive technology. Methods: We analyzed data on outcomes of assisted reproductive technology procedures as reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 1995 to 2001 by fertility clinics in the United States. We also analyzed data from the National Center for Health Statistics on the rates of twin births and triplet or higher-order multiple births. Results: From 1995 to 2001 in the United States, the number of infertility clinics, the number of fresh-embryo cycles initiated, and the number of fresh-embryo transfers increased steadily. The average number of embryos transferred per cycle began decreasing in 1997, with the steepest decline (an 11.1 percent decrease) between 1998 and 1999. In contrast, the number of pregnancies and live births per cycle during the period from 1995 to 2001 steadily increased. Even though the percentage of pregnancies with twins did not change significantly between 1997 and 2001, the percentage of pregnancies with three or more fetuses significantly decreased every year, with the steepest decline (a 20.8 percent decrease) between 1998 and 1999, after the publication in 1998 of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines for embryo transfer. Conclusions: Since 1997 in the United States, there have been consistent decreases in both the number of embryos transferred per cycle and the percentage of pregnancies with three or more fetuses, as well as a consistent increase in the percentage of live births per cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1645
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States
    Stem, Judy E.
    Cedars, Marcelle I.
    Jain, Tarun
    Klein, Nancy A.
    Beaird, C. Martin
    Grainger, David A.
    Gibbons, William E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 (02) : 275 - 282
  • [2] Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of single embryo transfer in the United States
    Luke, Barbara
    Brown, Morton B.
    Grainger, David A.
    Cedars, Marcelle
    Klein, Nancy
    Stern, Judy E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (02) : 490 - 498
  • [3] High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States
    Kovalevsky, G
    Patrizio, P
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (02) : 325 - 330
  • [4] Endometriosis and Assisted Reproductive Technology: United States Trends and Outcomes 2000-2011
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Crawford, Sara
    Session, Donna R.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (06) : 1537 - 1543
  • [5] Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Jungheim, Emily S.
    Ryan, Ginny L.
    Levens, Eric D.
    Cunningham, Alexandra F.
    Macones, George A.
    Carson, Kenneth R.
    Beltsos, Angeline N.
    Odem, Randall R.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : 1432 - 1436
  • [6] SURGICALLY ACQUIRED SPERM USE FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY: TRENDS AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES, UNITED STATES, 2004-2015
    Kawwass, Jennifer
    Chang, Jeani
    Boulet, Sheree
    Nangia, Ajay
    Mehta, Akanksha
    Kissin, Dmitry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E60 - E60
  • [7] Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment
    Tierney, Katherine
    Cai, Yong
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (06) : 1136 - +
  • [8] TRENDS OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY ( ART) TREATMENT PRACTICES AND OUTCOMES, UNITED STATES, 1996-2013.
    Kissin, D. M.
    Crawford, S.
    Boulet, S.
    Kulkarni, A.
    Toner, J. P.
    Van Voorhis, B.
    Jamieson, D. J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E216 - E217
  • [9] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States
    Rebar, RW
    DeCherney, AH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (16): : 1603 - 1604
  • [10] Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States
    Fujimoto, Victor Y.
    Luke, Barbara
    Brown, Morton B.
    Jain, Tarun
    Armstrong, Alicia
    Grainger, David A.
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (02) : 382 - 390