A comparison of statistical measurements of the orbital debris environment using radars

被引:0
|
作者
Stansbery, EG [1 ]
Settecerri, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Lyndon B Johnson Space Ctr, Orbital Debris Program Off, Houston, TX 77058 USA
来源
SPACE SAFETY AND RESCUE 1998 | 2000年 / 99卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The U.S. Space Command maintains a deterministic catalog of orbiting satellites and debris, which dates back to the beginning of the Space Age. However, the sensors and techniques used to create and maintain the catalog limit the size of the tracked objects to sizes larger than about 10-30 cm diameter. In order to understand the orbital debris environment for sizes smaller than this, statistical sampling has been used. NASA has been using the Haystack radar to statistically monitor the orbital debris environment since 1990. The Haystack measurements have been NASA's primary source of data in the important 0.4-20 cm diameter size range. Although the Haystack data comprise the largest database of observations, other radars have also been used to statistically sample the debris environment. The Haystack Auxiliary (HAX) radar, co-located with Haystack, began collecting debris data in 1994. By sharing location, real-time data collection hardware and software, and post-mission data analysis, any differences in results should be attributable to wavelength effects. The Goldstone radar is slightly more sensitive than Haystack and actually began sampling the debris environment in 1989, although for only a few hours each year. In 1996, a radar measurement campaign coordinated by the inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) was conducted using Haystack, the FGAN/TIRA radar operated in a bi-static mode with the Effelsbeg radio telescope, and the TRADEX radars. During this campaign each radar collected approximately 24 hours of statistical debris data. Limited data are also available from the ALTAIR, MU, and Arecibo radars collected prior to 1990. This paper will compare the results of these different measurements and attempt to reconcile any observed differences.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 220
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Elimination of the orbital debris threat: Using a ground laser to deorbit the debris objects
    Bekey, I
    SPACE SAFETY AND RESCUE 1997, 1999, 96 : 365 - 376
  • [42] The influence of the fragmentation threshold on the long term evolution of the orbital debris environment
    Cordelli, A
    Farinella, P
    Rossi, A
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1998, 46 (6-7) : 691 - 699
  • [43] Introducing IDES: Characterising the orbital debris environment in the past, present and future
    Walker, R
    Hauptmann, S
    Crowther, R
    Stokes, H
    Cant, A
    SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 1996, PTS 1 AND 2, 1996, 93 : 201 - 220
  • [44] Orbital debris size estimation from radar cross section measurements
    Rajan, N
    Morgan, T
    Lambour, R
    Kupiec, I
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SPACE DEBRIS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, 473 : 83 - 88
  • [45] Introducing IDES: Characterizing the orbital debris environment in the past, present and future
    Walker, R.
    Hauptmann, S.
    Crowther, R.
    Stokes, H.
    Cant, A.
    Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 93 (01):
  • [46] Overview of orbital debris detection using spaceborne radar
    Fu, Xiongjun
    Liu, Guoman
    Gao, Meiguo
    ICIEA 2008: 3RD IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 1071 - 1074
  • [47] Can the Orbital Debris Disease Be Cured Using Lasers?
    Scharring, Stefan
    Kaestel, Juergen
    AEROSPACE, 2023, 10 (07)
  • [48] LONG-TERM ORBITAL DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT SENSITIVITY TO SPACECRAFT BREAKUP PARAMETERS
    REINHARDT, AL
    BORER, W
    YATES, K
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH-SERIES, 1993, 13 (08): : 207 - 214
  • [49] EFFECT OF THE ORBITAL DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT ON THE HIGH-ENERGY VANALLEN PROTON BELT
    KONRADI, A
    SCIENCE, 1988, 242 (4883) : 1283 - 1286
  • [50] A standardized interface between orbital debris environment models and damage prediction tools
    Nölke, D
    Reimerdes, HG
    Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Space Debris, 2005, 587 : 607 - 612