A comparison of statistical measurements of the orbital debris environment using radars

被引:0
|
作者
Stansbery, EG [1 ]
Settecerri, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Lyndon B Johnson Space Ctr, Orbital Debris Program Off, Houston, TX 77058 USA
来源
SPACE SAFETY AND RESCUE 1998 | 2000年 / 99卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The U.S. Space Command maintains a deterministic catalog of orbiting satellites and debris, which dates back to the beginning of the Space Age. However, the sensors and techniques used to create and maintain the catalog limit the size of the tracked objects to sizes larger than about 10-30 cm diameter. In order to understand the orbital debris environment for sizes smaller than this, statistical sampling has been used. NASA has been using the Haystack radar to statistically monitor the orbital debris environment since 1990. The Haystack measurements have been NASA's primary source of data in the important 0.4-20 cm diameter size range. Although the Haystack data comprise the largest database of observations, other radars have also been used to statistically sample the debris environment. The Haystack Auxiliary (HAX) radar, co-located with Haystack, began collecting debris data in 1994. By sharing location, real-time data collection hardware and software, and post-mission data analysis, any differences in results should be attributable to wavelength effects. The Goldstone radar is slightly more sensitive than Haystack and actually began sampling the debris environment in 1989, although for only a few hours each year. In 1996, a radar measurement campaign coordinated by the inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) was conducted using Haystack, the FGAN/TIRA radar operated in a bi-static mode with the Effelsbeg radio telescope, and the TRADEX radars. During this campaign each radar collected approximately 24 hours of statistical debris data. Limited data are also available from the ALTAIR, MU, and Arecibo radars collected prior to 1990. This paper will compare the results of these different measurements and attempt to reconcile any observed differences.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 220
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AN OVERVIEW OF NASA'S ORBITAL DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT MODEL
    Matney, Mark
    GUIDANCE AND CONTROL 2010, 2010, 137 : 31 - 36
  • [32] ORBITAL DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT FOR SPACECRAFT IN LOW EARTH ORBIT
    KESSLER, DJ
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1991, 28 (03) : 347 - 351
  • [33] Simulation and modelling of orbital debris environment by equivalent breakups
    ISRO Satellite Cent, Bangalore, India
    Adv Space Res, 2 (309-312):
  • [34] Orbital debris environment as measured at the Mir Space Station
    Maag, CR
    Deshpande, SP
    Stevenson, TJ
    Mitzen, PS
    CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSEQUENCES OF ORBITAL DEBRIS AND NATURAL SPACE IMPACTORS, 1996, 2813 : 69 - 75
  • [35] US initiatives in the international effort to mitigate the orbital debris environment
    Levin, GM
    CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSEQUENCES OF ORBITAL DEBRIS AND NATURAL SPACE IMPACTORS, 1996, 2813 : 226 - 232
  • [36] ORBITAL DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT IN LOW-EARTH-ORBIT - AN UPDATE
    KESSLER, DJ
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH-SERIES, 1993, 13 (08): : 139 - 148
  • [37] Impact of satellite constellation arrangement on the future orbital debris environment
    Su, SY
    SPACE DEBRIS, 1997, 19 (02): : 351 - 354
  • [38] Development of orbital debris environment model in the low earth orbit
    Uramoto, K
    Hanada, T
    SPACE ACTIVITIES AND COOPERATION CONTRIBUTING TO ALL PACIFIC BASIN COUNTRIES, 2004, 117 : 927 - 938
  • [39] On the Risk of Kessler Syndrome: A Statistical Modeling Framework for Orbital Debris Growth
    Liang, Cameron
    Fanto, Paul
    Signoracci, Angelo
    JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 71 (05):
  • [40] Surface Current Measurements Using Marine Radars
    Horstmann, J.
    Carrasco, R.
    Seemann, J.
    Cysewski, M.
    2015 IEEE/OES 11TH CURRENT, WAVES AND TURBULENCE MEASUREMENT (CWTM), 2015,