Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research

被引:38
|
作者
Taguchi, Naoko [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Modern Languages Dept, Baker Hall 160,5000 Forbes, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
L2; pragmatics; Longitudinal research; Mixed methods; L2; INSTRUCTION; INTERLANGUAGE; PROFICIENCY; COMPETENCE; REQUESTS; CHINESE;
D O I
10.1016/j.system.2018.03.010
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Developmental research in L2 pragmatics addresses two essential issues: changes within the L2 pragmatics systems and influences on the systems (Bardovi-Harlig, 1999). These two issues can be best examined through the lens of longitudinal research, which by design allows us to observe how L2 learners change over time and helps establish causal relationships between change and time. Although the body of longitudinal studies describing changes has expanded in the past decade, not many studies have documented influences on the changing pragmatic systems. Existing studies are largely descriptive rather than explanatory, and do not explain how and why changes occurred. To address this limitation, this paper presents mixed methods research as a promising approach. By integrating quantitative and qualitative data analyses in a single study, mixed methods research can reveal patterns of change over time, and at the same time help reveal individual and contextual factors influencing the observed patterns. Using example studies, this paper illustrates how mixed methods approaches can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of pragmatic development. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research methods in rural studies: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods
    Strijker, Dirk
    Bosworth, Gary
    Bouter, Gosse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2020, 78 : 262 - 270
  • [2] MIXED METHODS RESEARCH AS A WAY OF COMBINING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS
    Kosmerl, Tadej
    [J]. SODOBNA PEDAGOGIKA-JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 72 (01): : 88 - 105
  • [3] Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education
    Borrego, Maura
    Douglas, Elliot P.
    Amelink, Catherine T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2009, 98 (01) : 53 - 66
  • [4] Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified
    Kawar, Lina Najib
    Dunbar, Ghada B.
    Aquino-Maneja, Emma M.
    Flores, Sarah L.
    Squier, Victoria Rondez
    Failla, Kim Reina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2024, 55 (07):
  • [5] Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
    Huyler, Debaro
    McGill, Craig M.
    [J]. NEW HORIZONS IN ADULT EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (03): : 75 - 77
  • [6] QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF MANAGERIAL STRUCTURES - EXPLANATION AND DESCRIPTION OF ONE FIELD RESEARCH
    TSIRULNI.D
    WEINSHAL.TD
    [J]. MEGAMOT, 1974, 20 (03): : 299 - 309
  • [7] Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research
    McCusker, K.
    Gunaydin, S.
    [J]. PERFUSION-UK, 2015, 30 (07): : 537 - 542
  • [8] The integration of qualitative and quantitative research - theoretical foundations of "mixed methods"
    Kelle, Udo
    [J]. KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2017, 69 : 39 - 61
  • [9] Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research: An illustration
    Hands, Africa S.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE, 2022, 45 (01):
  • [10] Mixed Methods Research a Bridge Between the Qualitative and Quantitative Dilemma
    Knox, Karl
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM 2015), 2015, : 225 - 231