Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education

被引:276
|
作者
Borrego, Maura
Douglas, Elliot P. [2 ]
Amelink, Catherine T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Div Student Affairs, Blacksburg, VA USA
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
quantitative; qualitative; mixed-methods research; COOPERATIVE EDUCATION; STUDENT PERCEPTIONS; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; DISCIPLINE; COMMUNITY; PARADIGM; WORK;
D O I
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research review is to open dialog about quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education research. Our position is that no particular method is privileged over any other. Rather, the choice must be driven by the research questions. For each approach we offer a definition, aims, appropriate research questions, evaluation criteria, and examples from the Journal of Engineering Education. Then, we present empirical results from a prestigious international conference on engineering education research. Participants expressed disappointment in the low representation of qualitative studies; nonetheless, there appeared to be a strong preference for quantitative methods, particularly classroom-based experiments. Given the wide variety of issues still to be explored within engineering education, we expect that quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches will be essential in the future. We encourage readers to further investigate alternate research methods by accessing some of our sources and collaborating across education/social science and engineering disciplinary boundaries.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 66
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Workshop - Quantifying Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research in Engineering Education
    Creamer, E. G.
    [J]. 2011 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2011,
  • [2] Research methods in rural studies: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods
    Strijker, Dirk
    Bosworth, Gary
    Bouter, Gosse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2020, 78 : 262 - 270
  • [3] MIXED METHODS RESEARCH AS A WAY OF COMBINING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS
    Kosmerl, Tadej
    [J]. SODOBNA PEDAGOGIKA-JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 72 (01): : 88 - 105
  • [4] Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods
    Burga, Andres
    [J]. REVISTA PERUANA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA, 2009, 1 (01): : 181 - 184
  • [5] Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified
    Kawar, Lina Najib
    Dunbar, Ghada B.
    Aquino-Maneja, Emma M.
    Flores, Sarah L.
    Squier, Victoria Rondez
    Failla, Kim Reina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2024, 55 (07):
  • [6] Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
    Huyler, Debaro
    McGill, Craig M.
    [J]. NEW HORIZONS IN ADULT EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (03): : 75 - 77
  • [7] A Mixed Methods Analysis and Evaluation of the Mixed Methods Research Literature in Engineering Education
    Kajfez, Rachel Louis
    Creamer, Elizabeth G.
    [J]. 2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [8] Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research
    McCusker, K.
    Gunaydin, S.
    [J]. PERFUSION-UK, 2015, 30 (07): : 537 - 542
  • [9] Putting the "Mix" in Mixed Methods: How to Integrate Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Early Childhood Special Education Research
    Love, Hailey R.
    Fettig, Angel
    Steed, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. TOPICS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2023, 43 (03) : 174 - 186
  • [10] The integration of qualitative and quantitative research - theoretical foundations of "mixed methods"
    Kelle, Udo
    [J]. KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2017, 69 : 39 - 61