MIXED METHODS RESEARCH AS A WAY OF COMBINING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS

被引:0
|
作者
Kosmerl, Tadej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljani, Filozofska Fak, Oddelek Pedag Andrag, Askerceva 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
mixed methods research; mixed methods models; integration of quantitative and qualitative data; research approaches; methodology; METHODS-RESEARCH STARTS; METHODS DESIGNS; INTEGRATION; PRINCIPLES; DECADE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Mixed methods research combines qualitative and quantitative research approaches in a way that yields more valid results than using only one or the other approach. It has been developing markedly over the last three decades and various comprehensive mixed methods designs methods have emerged to date. Among them, the convergent, the explanatory sequential, and exploratory sequential design appear as fundamental. Designs can be predetermined or developed spontaneously during the research process if the need to obtain additional or different (qualitative or quantitative) empirical data appears in order to adequately address the research questions. These are qualitative and quantitative in mixed methods research (they require one or the other type of data) and frequently followed by a mixed methods question that specifically inquires about the contribution of the implementation of mixed methods. In the phases of data collection and analysis, thorough implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods is crucial in order to enable efficient integration of both types of data in the interpretation phase, which is the key step in mixed methods research. Integration can be accomplished by combining data, explaining one type of data with another, using one type of data to plan the collection of additional data, or with mutual reinforcement. In the research report, integration can be presented descriptively, through transformation of one type of data to another, or with a combined graphical representation of the results.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 105
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Some Arguments for Mixed Methods Research
    Lund, Thorleif
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 56 (02) : 155 - 165
  • [2] MIXED RESEARCH METHODS: INTEGRATING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODS
    Vazquez-Miraz, Pedro
    Medina, Maria Fernanda
    EMPIRIA, 2024, (62): : 219 - 222
  • [3] Research methods in rural studies: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods
    Strijker, Dirk
    Bosworth, Gary
    Bouter, Gosse
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2020, 78 : 262 - 270
  • [4] AN UNEASY ALLIANCE - COMBINING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS
    BUCHANAN, DR
    HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1992, 19 (01): : 117 - 135
  • [5] Combining Ethnography and Surveys Mixed methods research designs beyond combining qualitative interviews with quantitative surveys
    Baur, Nina
    Hering, Linda
    KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2017, 69 : 387 - 414
  • [6] Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education
    Borrego, Maura
    Douglas, Elliot P.
    Amelink, Catherine T.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2009, 98 (01) : 53 - 66
  • [7] Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified
    Kawar, Lina Najib
    Dunbar, Ghada B.
    Aquino-Maneja, Emma M.
    Flores, Sarah L.
    Squier, Victoria Rondez
    Failla, Kim Reina
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2024, 55 (07): : 338 - 344
  • [8] Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
    Huyler, Debaro
    McGill, Craig M.
    NEW HORIZONS IN ADULT EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (03): : 75 - 77
  • [9] Methods in development research: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches.
    Bhandary, Uddhab
    DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2007, 25 (03) : 393 - 394
  • [10] "Mixed Methods" in Evaluation Research - Working with the Opportunities and Boundaries of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods
    Kelle, Udo
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVALUATION, 2018, 17 (01): : 25 - 52