Histologic comparison of autologous fat processing methods

被引:54
|
作者
Rose, JG
Lucarelli, MJ
Lemke, BN
Dortzbach, RK
Boxrud, CA
Obagi, S
Patel, S
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Oculoplast Serv, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jules Stein Eye Inst, Div Orbitofacial Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Dermatol, Cosmet Surg & Skin Hlth Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Ophthalm Pathol Serv, Madison, WI USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.iop.0000217710.09941.10
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To perform a quantitative analysis of adipocyte viability after fat processing during autologous fat transfer, comparing the processing methods of washing, centrifuging, and sedimentation. Methods: An experimental study was conducted in which 24 fat samples were obtained after processing from 22 patients undergoing autologous fat transfer. Histologic analysis of periodic acid-Schiff-stained specimens was then performed. Results: Cell counts per high-powered field of intact adipocytes and nucleated adipocytes and adipocyte cross-sectional area were significantly greater in samples processed by sedimentation, compared with those by centrifuging or washing. Conclusions: Of the various processing techniques currently used during autologous fat transfer, sedimentation appears to yield a higher proportion of viable adipocytes than does washing or centrifuging.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 200
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF SIRE EVALUATION METHODS FOR FAT TEST
    KENNEDY, BW
    MOXLEY, JE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1977, 57 (01) : 221 - 223
  • [32] A Prospective Pilot Study Comparing Rate of Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Grafting
    Hanson, Summer E.
    Garvey, Patrick B.
    Chang, Edward I.
    Reece, Gregory
    Liu, Jun
    Butler, Charles E.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2019, 39 (03) : 331 - 337
  • [33] A COMPARISON OF FOUR METHODS FOR ASSESSING PERCENT FAT
    Borowski, K. M.
    Thomas, D. Q.
    McCaw, S. T.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2001, 33 (05): : S241 - S241
  • [34] COMPARISON OF RAPID METHODS FOR DETERMINING FAT IN MILK
    SHERBON, JW
    SHIPE, WF
    TYRRELL, HF
    BURKE, JD
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1967, 50 (06) : 936 - &
  • [35] Comparison of fat determination methods depending on fat definition in bakery products
    Shin, Jae-Min
    Park, Seung-Kook
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 63 (02) : 972 - 977
  • [36] Secretome processing for proteomics: A methods comparison
    Almeida-Marques, Catarina
    Rolfs, Frank
    Piersma, Sander R.
    Bijnsdorp, Irene V.
    Pham, Thang V.
    Knol, Jaco C.
    Jimenez, Connie R.
    PROTEOMICS, 2024, 24 (07)
  • [37] A COMPARISON OF SEISMIC ARRAY PROCESSING METHODS
    GREEN, PE
    KELLY, EJ
    LEVIN, MJ
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1966, 11 (1-2): : 67 - &
  • [38] Current German and American guidelines for autologous fat grafting - a transatlantic comparison
    Broelsch, G. Felix
    Koenneker, Soeren
    Ipaktchi, Ramin
    Vogt, Peter M.
    HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2017, 49 (06) : 408 - 414
  • [39] HISTOLOGIC DETECTION OF FAT EMBOLI
    DAVISON, PR
    COHLE, SD
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 1987, 32 (05) : 1426 - 1430
  • [40] Autologous Fat Transplantation
    Herold, Christian
    Rennekampff, Hans-Oliver
    Allert, Sixtus
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 115 (35-36): : 596 - 596