Craniofacial reconstruction by transport distraction osteogenesis: Corticotomy versus osteotomy - An experimental study

被引:7
|
作者
Kramer, FJ
Mueller, M
Rahmstorf, M
Swennen, G
Dempf, R
Schierle, H
机构
[1] Med Hochsch Hannover, Klin Mund Kiefer & Gesichtschirurg, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Med Hochsch Hannover, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
bifocal distraction; transport osteogenesis; calvaria; bone regeneration; distraction osteogenesis;
D O I
10.1097/00001665-200407000-00006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Transport osteogenesis is a modified technique of callus distraction appropriate for the reconstruction of extended osseous defects of long or flat bones. The aim of this study was to determine the regenerative potential of this technique related to the degree of mobilization of the transport segment. In 10 adult sheep, critically sized defects of the calvaria were treated by gradual movement of a transport segment consisting of calvarial bone. The transport segments were either corticotomized (n = 5) or osteotomized (n = 5). The latency period was 5 days; the rate of distraction was 1 mm/d, extended for approximately 40 days. The consolidation period was 28 days. Specimens were investigated by conventional radiography, computed tomography scans, immunofluorescence, and histological examination. In both groups, transport osteogenesis resulted in a complete closure of the defect. The volume and thickness of newly formed bone at the defect site did not differ significantly between the groups, nor did the extent of vascularization. Bone formation and remodeling occurred during the entire period of distraction and consolidation. Osteotomized transport segments became smaller during distraction, whereas the volume of corticotomized segments remained relatively constant. In conclusion, transport osteogenesis resulted in reliable closure of extended skull defects in adult organisms; corticotomy and osteotomy of the transport segment led to a similar extent of bone formation.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 565
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reconstruction Using Transport Distraction Osteogenesis with Indigenous Distractors: A Case Series
    Andrade, Neelam
    Mathai, Paul
    Venkatakrishan, Lakshmi
    Gupta, Varsha
    Modukuri, Sri Chandana
    Sandilya, Vikas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2023,
  • [32] Versatility of Transport Distraction Osteogenesis for Reconstruction of Lateral Mandibular Ablative Defects
    Neelakandan, R. S.
    Zachariah, Thomas
    Kuchimanchi, Phani Kumar
    Devadoss, Pradeep
    Shankar, Dhayasankar Prabhu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2024, 23 (03): : 630 - 638
  • [33] Experience with Mandibular Reconstruction Using Transport-Disc-Distraction Osteogenesis
    Pingarron-Martin, Lorena
    Gonzalez Otero, T.
    Arias Gallo, L. J.
    [J]. CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION, 2015, 8 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [34] Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in the Reconstruction of Pediatric Posttraumatic Calvarial Defects
    Elbanoby, Tarek
    Aly, Caber M.
    Abdelfattah, Usama
    Choi, Jong-Woo
    Power, Hollie A.
    Fattah, Yasser A. Abd El
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (05) : 2201
  • [35] Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial
    Baas, E. M.
    Bierenbroodspot, F.
    de Lange, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (02) : 180 - 188
  • [36] Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Versus Distraction Osteogenesis for Advancement of the Retrognathic Mandible
    Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed
    Ellis, Edward, III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (08) : 1564 - 1574
  • [37] Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis
    Vos, M. D.
    Baas, E. M.
    de lange, J.
    Bierenbroodspot, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [38] Perioperative Morbidity in Posterior Cranial Vault Expansion: Distraction Osteogenesis versus Conventional Osteotomy
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    Derderian, Christopher A.
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    Fiadjoe, John E.
    Sussman, Emily M.
    Stricker, Paul A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (04) : 674E - 680E
  • [39] Combined Orthognathic Distraction Procedure: Le Fort I Maxillary Osteotomy and Mandibular Curvilinear Distraction Osteogenesis. A New Technique for Craniofacial Management
    Schendel, Stephen A.
    Hazan-Molina, Hagai
    Aizenbud, Dror
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (04) : 874 - 877
  • [40] Condylar resorption post mandibular distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial microsomia: A retrospective study
    Shu, Kai-yi
    Liu, Wei
    Zhao, Jiu-li
    Zhang, Zhi-yong
    Shan, Ba-ga
    Li, Xi-yuan
    Ma, Lun-Kun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 51 (11) : 675 - 681