Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Versus Distraction Osteogenesis for Advancement of the Retrognathic Mandible

被引:19
|
作者
Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed [1 ]
Ellis, Edward, III [2 ]
机构
[1] Thamar Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Thamar, Yemen
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
SURGICAL-ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; ALVEOLAR NERVE FUNCTION; NEUROSENSORY DISTURBANCE; CONDYLAR RESORPTION; SUPRAHYOID MYOTOMY; RIGID FIXATION; TERM STABILITY; RELAPSE; SURGERY; SKELETAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to identify significant differences in skeletal stability and neurosensory disturbance (NSD) of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) between bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) and distraction osteogenesis (DO) for mandibular advancement surgery. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic and electronic search of several databases using specific keywords, a reference search, and a manual search through November 2014. The inclusion criteria were clinical human studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and retrospective studies, with the aim of comparing BSSO and DO (predictor variables) after mandibular advancement surgery with regard to skeletal stability and NSD of the IAN (outcome variables). Both linear and angular measurements of the horizontal and vertical positions of the mandible were analyzed. For binary outcomes, we calculated a standard estimation of the risk ratio using the random-effects model if heterogeneity was detected; otherwise, a fixed effects model, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was used. Weighted mean differences or standard mean differences were used to construct forest plots of continuous data. In addition, the number needed to treat, with the 95% CIs, was calculated for NSD of the IAN. Results: Our initial PubMed search identified 215 studies, of which 9 met our inclusion criteria-3 RCTs, 1 CCT, and 5 retrospective studies. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups regarding skeletal stability in either the vertical (P = .34) or horizontal (P = .88) direction. A statistically significant difference was found between BSSO and DO with regard to NSD of IAN function (P = .004). Conclusion: The results of the present meta-analysis have shown that DO significantly reduced the incidence of NSD of the IAN after lengthening of the retrognathic mandible compared with the BBSO. (C) 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1564 / 1574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature
    Schreuder, W. H.
    Jansma, J.
    Bierman, M. W. J.
    Vissink, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 36 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [2] Long-lasting neurosensory disturbance following advancement of the retrognathic mandible: distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Wijbenga, J. G.
    Verlinden, C. R. A.
    Jansma, J.
    Becking, A. G.
    Stegenga, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (07) : 719 - 725
  • [3] Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial
    Baas, E. M.
    Bierenbroodspot, F.
    de Lange, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (02) : 180 - 188
  • [4] Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis
    Vos, M. D.
    Baas, E. M.
    de lange, J.
    Bierenbroodspot, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [5] Transverse Changes in Mandible Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement
    Deshmukh, Tushar
    Sahoo, N. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2019, 18 (03): : 447 - 451
  • [6] Transverse Changes in Mandible Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement
    Tushar Deshmukh
    N. K. Sahoo
    [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2019, 18 : 447 - 451
  • [7] Intraoral distraction osteogenesis versus sagittal split osteotomy to lengthen the mandible
    Guerrero, CA
    Bell, WH
    Domínguez, EA
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2003, : 133 - 138
  • [8] Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis
    Baas, E. M.
    Pijpe, J.
    de Lange, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (02) : 137 - 141
  • [9] Subjective Alveolar Nerve Function After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy or Distraction Osteogenesis of Mandible
    Baas, Erik M.
    Horsthuis, Roy B. G.
    de Lange, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (04) : 910 - 918
  • [10] Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial
    Baas, E. M.
    Bierenbroodspot, F.
    de Lange, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (05) : 615 - 620