A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts

被引:13
|
作者
Schmitt, Betina Madeira [1 ]
Zirbes, Christiano Fraga [1 ]
Bonin, Cassiano [1 ]
Lohmann, Daniel [2 ]
Lencina, Diovani Castoldi [1 ]
Sabino Netto, Aurelio da Costa [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Fed Santa Catarina, Grp Pesquisa Proc Fabricacao & Tecnol Mat PFBMAT, Ave Mauro Ramos 950, BR-88020300 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Inst Fed Santa Catarina, Grp Automacao Aplicada GRA, Ave Mauro Ramos 950, BR-88020300 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
3D printing; Cartesian Printer; Delta Printer; Dimensional Evaluation; Surface quality;
D O I
10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-1039
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The additive manufacturing processes emerged at the end of the last century and became popular by low-cost 3D printers. The most used printers work on a cartesian configuration, but recently were launched delta machines. These 3D printers use a more complex control system due to their trajectories generation but may present some advantages over the cartesian configuration. To increase the knowledge about additive manufacturing, a comparative study with cartesian and delta printers was performed to evaluate the performance on printing a testing part. Three samples were produced in each printer and compared based on surface quality, manufacturing time, mass and dimensional measurement. The printed objects were 3D scanned for comparing the digitized geometry by aligning the point cloud generated to its virtual 3D model. The parts produced in delta printer obtained better surface quality, while cartesian printer provided better dimensional accuracy. The results also showed that the variation of the mass and time to produce the parts were not significant.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 886
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three-dimensional comparative study on the accuracy and reproducibility of dental casts fabricated by 3D printers
    Park, Mid-Eum
    Shin, Soo-Yeon
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 119 (05): : 861.e1 - 861.e7
  • [32] Development of an error compensation case study for 3D printers
    Majarena, A. C.
    Aguilar, J. J.
    Santolaria, J.
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2017 (MESIC 2017), 2017, 13 : 864 - 871
  • [33] Safety in handling 3D printers
    Schmauder, Martin
    Höhn, Katrin
    Hilgers, Inga-Lisa
    Technische Sicherheit, 2019, 9 (04): : 10 - 16
  • [34] 3D Printers Enter the Kitchen
    Katsnelson, Alla
    ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE, 2021, 7 (12) : 1959 - 1962
  • [35] 3D printers - are they electromagnetically compatible?
    Goleman, Ryszard
    Mazurek, Pawel A.
    Holuk, Mariusz
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2022, 98 (12): : 246 - 249
  • [36] Accuracy of surgical guides manufactured with four different 3D printers. A comparative in vitro study
    Moron-Conejo, Belen
    Berrendero, Santiago
    Salido, Maria Paz
    Zarauz, Cristina
    Pradies, Guillermo
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 148
  • [37] THE EFFECT OF LAYER THICKNESS ON REPEATABILITY OF 3D PRINTED PLA PARTS PRODUCED USING OPENWARE 3D PRINTER
    Maideen, Normariah Che
    Rahim, Mohd Ikmal Hisham Abdul
    Budin, Salina
    Hyie, Mei
    Yusoff, Hamid
    IIUM ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 23 (02): : 218 - 227
  • [38] Digital Forensics of 3D Printers
    Garcia, Victor
    Varol, Cihan
    2018 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DIGITAL FORENSIC AND SECURITY (ISDFS), 2018, : 297 - 304
  • [39] 3D Model Data Generation and Conversion for 3D Printers
    Kim, Sungsuk
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 2015, 44 (03) : 815 - 822
  • [40] 3D Model Data Generation and Conversion for 3D Printers
    Sungsuk Kim
    Journal of Electronic Materials, 2015, 44 : 815 - 822