Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

被引:70
|
作者
Sadhu, Anita [1 ]
Nam, Denis [1 ]
Coobs, Benjamin R. [1 ]
Barrack, Toby N. [1 ]
Nunley, Ryan M. [1 ]
Barrack, Robert L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Campus Box 8233, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2017年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; dislocation; acetabular positioning; safe zone; stability; SURGICAL APPROACH; REPLACEMENT; STABILITY; OFFSET; ZONE; THA;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recently, the importance of acetabular component positioning in the Lewinnek "safe zone" in preventing prosthetic dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of acetabular components within the Lewinnek safe zone between primary and revision THAs that have sustained a dislocation vs matched controls without a dislocation event. Methods: This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved investigation of THAs performed at our institution or referred to our institution between 1997 and 2013. Ninety-six primary THAs and 60 revision THAs that sustained a dislocation were included and matched 1: 1 based on age, gender, and body mass index with nondislocated controls. Acetabular component inclination and anteversion were performed using Martell Hip Analysis Suite and compared between the 2 cohorts for both primary and revision THAs. Results: The proportion of acetabular components within the safe zone for both inclination and anteversion was 23 of 96 (24%) in primary THA dislocators vs 48 of 96 (50%, P <.001) in controls. The proportion of acetabular components within the safe zone for both inclination and anteversion was 28 of 60 (47%) in revision THA dislocators vs 40 of 60 (66%, P=.03) in controls. Conclusion: Patients sustaining a dislocation following a primary or revision THA had acetabular components less frequently positioned within the safe zone compared to control patients. This study suggests acetabular component positioning remains an important variable in decreasing the risk of dislocation following primary and revision THA. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 991
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Ong, Kevin
    Lau, Edmund
    Calkins, Tyler E.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (03): : 250 - 256
  • [2] Dislocation after primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty - hip geometry and risk factors (a matched cohort analysis)
    Zecevic-Lukovic, Tanja
    Mladenovic, Kristina
    Kostic, Nikola
    Donovic, Nela
    Milenkovic, Bojan
    Mladenovic, Rasa
    [J]. SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2020, 148 (11-12) : 711 - 717
  • [3] Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty A systematic review of the literature
    Seagrave, Kurt G.
    Troelsen, Anders
    Malchau, Henrik
    Husted, Henrik
    Gromov, Kirill
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2017, 88 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [4] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component
    Adelani, Muyibat A.
    Mall, Nathan A.
    Nyazee, Humaa
    Clohisy, John C.
    Barrack, Robert L.
    Nunley, Ryan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (12): : 1015 - 1020
  • [5] Effect of dislocation timing following primary total hip arthroplasty on the risk of redislocation and revision
    Norambuena, German A.
    Wyles, Cody C.
    Van Demark, Robert E.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 29 (05) : 489 - 495
  • [6] The effect of acetabular and femoral component version on dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Takaaki Fujishiro
    Takafumi Hiranaka
    Shingo Hashimoto
    Shinya Hayashi
    Masahiro Kurosaka
    Taiki Kanno
    Takeshi Masuda
    [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2016, 40 : 697 - 702
  • [7] The effect of acetabular and femoral component version on dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Fujishiro, Takaaki
    Hiranaka, Takafumi
    Hashimoto, Shingo
    Hayashi, Shinya
    Kurosaka, Masahiro
    Kanno, Taiki
    Masuda, Takeshi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 40 (04) : 697 - 702
  • [8] Acetabular Component and Liner Selection for the Prevention of Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Kunze, Kyle N.
    Premkumar, Ajay
    Bovonratwet, Patawut
    Sculco, Peter K.
    [J]. JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [9] Risk factors for dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty
    Suva, Domizio L.
    Lubbeke, Anne
    Zimmermann, Doris
    Peter, Robin
    Hoffmeyer, Pierre
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142 : S19 - S19
  • [10] Revision arthroplasty of the hip - Acetabular component
    Gollwitzer, H.
    von Eisenhart-Rothe, R.
    Holzapfel, B. M.
    Gradinger, R.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2010, 81 (04): : 284 - +