INTEGRATING REASONING ABOUT ACTIONS AND BAYESIAN NETWORKS

被引:0
|
作者
Martini, Yves [1 ]
Thielscher, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] SAP AG, SAP Res CEC Dresden, Chemnitzer Str 48, D-01187 Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Artif Intelligence Inst, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Knowledge representation and reasoning; SITUATION CALCULUS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
According to the paradigm of Cognitive Robotics (Reiter, 2001a), intelligent, autonomous agents interacting with an incompletely known world need to reason logically about the effects of their actions and sensor information they acquire over time. In realistic settings, both the effect of actions and sensor data are subject to errors. A cognitive agent can cope with these uncertainties by maintaining probabilistic beliefs about the state of world. In this paper, we show a formalism to represent probabilistic beliefs about states of the world and how these beliefs change in the course of actions. Additionally, we propose an extension to a logic programming framework, the agent programming language FLUX, to actually infer this probabilistic knowledge for agents. Using associated Bayesian networks allows the agents to maintain a single and compact probabilistic knowledge state throughout the execution of an action sequence.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A dynamic description logic for representation and reasoning about actions
    Chang, Liang
    Lin, Fen
    Shi, Zhongzhi
    KNOWLEDGE SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 4798 : 115 - 127
  • [42] Verifying Business Process Compliance by Reasoning about Actions
    D'Aprile, Davide
    Giordano, Laura
    Gliozzi, Valentina
    Martelli, Alberto
    Pozzato, Gian Luca
    Dupre, Daniele Theseider
    COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2010, 6245 : 99 - +
  • [43] Research on Representation for Reasoning about Actions of Robot with Sensor
    Gan, Li
    Li, Jia
    Liu, Jianzhuang
    2011 AASRI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INDUSTRY APPLICATION (AASRI-AIIA 2011), VOL 1, 2011, : 246 - 249
  • [44] Reasoning about actions with CHRs and finite domain constraints
    Thielscher, M
    LOGICS PROGRAMMING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2401 : 70 - 84
  • [45] Neural Reasoning about Agents' Goals, Preferences, and Actions
    Bortoletto, Matteo
    Shi, Lei
    Bulling, Andreas
    THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 1, 2024, : 456 - 464
  • [46] Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions
    Tolchinsky, Pancho
    Modgil, Sanjay
    Atkinson, Katie
    McBurney, Peter
    Cortes, Ulises
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 25 (02) : 209 - 259
  • [47] Reasoning about actions and change in Answer Set Programming
    Dimopoulos, Y
    Kakas, AC
    Michael, L
    LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND NONMONOTONIC REASONING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 2923 : 61 - 73
  • [48] Reasoning about actions with loops via Hoare logic
    He, Jiankun
    Zhao, Xishun
    FRONTIERS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 10 (05) : 870 - 888
  • [49] Nondeterministic actions with typical effects: Reasoning about scenarios
    Dunin-Keplicz, B
    Radzikowska, A
    FORMAL MODELS OF AGENTS, 1999, 1760 : 143 - 156
  • [50] Process algebra approach to reasoning about concurrent actions
    Yuan Feng
    Ming-Sheng Ying
    Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2004, 19 : 364 - 373