INTEGRATING REASONING ABOUT ACTIONS AND BAYESIAN NETWORKS

被引:0
|
作者
Martini, Yves [1 ]
Thielscher, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] SAP AG, SAP Res CEC Dresden, Chemnitzer Str 48, D-01187 Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Artif Intelligence Inst, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Knowledge representation and reasoning; SITUATION CALCULUS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
According to the paradigm of Cognitive Robotics (Reiter, 2001a), intelligent, autonomous agents interacting with an incompletely known world need to reason logically about the effects of their actions and sensor information they acquire over time. In realistic settings, both the effect of actions and sensor data are subject to errors. A cognitive agent can cope with these uncertainties by maintaining probabilistic beliefs about the state of world. In this paper, we show a formalism to represent probabilistic beliefs about states of the world and how these beliefs change in the course of actions. Additionally, we propose an extension to a logic programming framework, the agent programming language FLUX, to actually infer this probabilistic knowledge for agents. Using associated Bayesian networks allows the agents to maintain a single and compact probabilistic knowledge state throughout the execution of an action sequence.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reasoning About Intentions: Counterexamples to Reasons for Actions
    Juhos, Csongor
    Quelhas, Ana Cristina
    Byrne, Ruth M. J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2015, 41 (01) : 55 - 76
  • [32] Dynamic logic for reasoning about actions and agents
    Meyer, JJC
    LOGIC-BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 597 : 281 - 311
  • [33] Argument Schemes for Reasoning About the Actions of Others
    Atkinson, Katie
    Bench-Capon, Trevor
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2016, 287 : 71 - 82
  • [34] Reasoning about actions, knowledge and normative ability
    Lai, Xianwei
    Hu, Shanli
    Ning, Zhengyuan
    INTELLIGENT INFORMATION PROCESSING III, 2006, 228 : 43 - +
  • [35] Probabilistic Logic for Reasoning About Actions in Time
    Dautovic, Sejla
    Doder, Dragan
    SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, ECSQARU 2019, 2019, 11726 : 385 - 396
  • [36] Reasoning about actions and events in situational simulations
    Mukherjee, A
    Rojas, EM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1552 - 1560
  • [37] Bayesian Reasoning with Trained Neural Networks
    Knollmueller, Jakob
    Ensslin, Torsten A.
    ENTROPY, 2021, 23 (06)
  • [38] Combining Bayesian belief networks and the goal structuring notation to support architectural reasoning about safety
    Wu, Weihang
    Kelly, Tim
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4680 : 172 - +
  • [39] ECAVI: a Teaching Assistant for Reasoning about Actions and Change
    Basina, Nena
    Patkos, Theodore
    Plexousakis, Dirnitris
    ERCIM NEWS, 2020, (122): : 54 - 55
  • [40] PDL-based framework for reasoning about actions
    DeGiacomo, G
    Lenzerini, M
    TOPICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 992 : 103 - 114