A new method to evaluate risk in failure mode and effects analysis under fuzzy information

被引:34
|
作者
Huang, Zhiming [1 ]
Jiang, Wen [1 ]
Tang, Yongchuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Elect & Informat, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis; Fuzzy information; Risk priority number; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory; Belief entropy; Evidential downscaling method; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; D NUMBERS; FMEA; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-017-2664-x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a useful and effective tool to identify and mitigate project risk, which utilizes the risk priority number (RPN) to determine the risk priority order of failure modes. In many applications when multiple experts give their opinions about one failure mode, the risk evaluations can be vague and imprecise, which could arise conflicting evidence that is hard to manage. To address this issue, the information offered by experts should be analyzed under a model of fuzzy numbers and Dempster-Shafer (D-S) combination theory. Here, the traditional RPN is not sufficient for risk evaluation. A new RPN is proposed in this paper with two parts. The first part is a product of memberships whose average degrees are equal to one, and the second part results from applying the Dempster-Shafer theory with tools of evidential downscaling method and belief entropy function. The new RPN can be effective and convictive to handle conflicting evidence in FEMA.
引用
收藏
页码:4779 / 4787
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis under Fuzziness
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Kaya, Ihsan
    [J]. BEYOND EXPERIENCE IN RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2011, 16 : 27 - 32
  • [42] Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Under Fuzziness
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Kaya, Ihsan
    Senvar, Ozlem
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2013, 19 (02): : 538 - 552
  • [43] Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to Evaluate Risk in the Clinical Adoption of Automated Contouring and Treatment Planning Tools
    Nealon, Kelly A.
    Balter, Peter A.
    Douglas, Raphael J.
    Fullen, Danna K.
    Nitsch, Paige L.
    Olanrewaju, Adenike M.
    Soliman, Moaaz
    Court, Laurence E.
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12 (04) : E344 - E353
  • [44] An Integrated Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on Weight of Risk Factors and Fuzzy PROMETHEE II
    Lian, Xiaozhen
    Hou, Liang
    Zhang, Wenbo
    Bu, Xiangjian
    Yan, Huasheng
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (06):
  • [45] Risk prioritization in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets
    Bozdag, Erhan
    Asan, Umut
    Soyer, Ayberk
    Serdarasan, Seyda
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (08) : 4000 - 4015
  • [46] A risk assessment approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidence theory
    Guo, Jian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (02) : 869 - 881
  • [47] Risk analysis by integrated fuzzy expected value method and fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis for an elevated metro rail project of Ahmedabad, India
    Sarkar, Debasis
    Singh, Manvinder
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22 (10) : 1818 - 1829
  • [48] An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information
    Li, Ying
    Liu, Peide
    Li, Gang
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 235
  • [49] Risk Assessment with Failure Mode and Effects Analysis and Grey Relational Analysis Method in Plastic Injection Process
    Unlukal, Ceren
    Senel, Mine
    Senel, Bilgin
    [J]. THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES (CMES2018), 2018, 22
  • [50] A model for failure mode and effects analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy approach
    Tooranloo, Hossein Sayyadi
    Ayatollah, Arezoo Sadat
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 49 : 238 - 247