Factors of knowledge sharing in managing cross-functional teams

被引:0
|
作者
Kalabina, E. G. [1 ]
Belyak, O. Yu. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ural State Univ Econ, Inst Econ & Finance, Ekaterinburg, Russia
[2] Prosoft Syst Ltd, Ekaterinburg, Russia
关键词
cross-functional teams; knowledge sharing; coordination mechanisms; intrinsic motivation; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONS; COORDINATION; ANTECEDENTS; MECHANISMS; MOTIVATION; LEADERSHIP; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21638/spbu18.2021.407
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The article is devoted to study the factors of knowledge sharing in managing the cross-functional teams of Russian companies within innovative development.The goal of the paper was to analyze the influence of individual, organizational, and managerial factors on the activity of cross-functional team members in knowledge sharing. Based on the results of the survey among 259 participants of cross-functional teams, the econometric assessment was done to determine that intrinsic motivation as an individual factor makes sense asa moderator for exolaining the relationship between organizational, managerial factors and activity of participants in knowledge sharing. As a result of the analysis of the management factorsthe most favorable mechanism of coordination for knowledge exchange was mutual coordination.It was implemented through informal communication and iwas based on understanding of roles, degree of responsibility and sense of belonging by the team members.It was also revealed that organizational factors, including the system of incentives, havd little influence on the activity of participants in knowledge sharing. The findings can be the basis for appropriate choosing the cross-functional team management tools for innovative development.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 547
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamics of Decision Making in Cross-Functional Teams
    Anibaba, Yetunde
    Akaighe, Godbless
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, 2018, 12 (04) : 485 - 496
  • [22] Improving hospital flow with cross-functional teams
    Yong, HG
    [J]. ASQC'S 51ST ANNUAL QUALITY CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 264 - 273
  • [23] If Cross-functional Teams are the Answer, What is the Question?
    Pun, W. K. Daniel
    Santa, Ricardo
    [J]. NSS: 2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORK AND SYSTEM SECURITY, 2009, : 501 - +
  • [24] IMPROVING COST PERFORMANCE WITH CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAMS
    LIKERT, R
    [J]. CONFERENCE BOARD RECORD, 1975, 12 (09): : 51 - 59
  • [25] Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams
    Robey, D
    Khoo, HM
    Powers, C
    [J]. TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2000, 47 (01) : 51 - 66
  • [26] CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAMS - ARE THEY ALWAYS THE RIGHT MOVE
    ANDREWS, HZ
    [J]. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1995, 73 (06) : 12 - 13
  • [27] Deployment Coordination for Cross-Functional DevOps Teams
    Sokolowski, Daniel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH ACM JOINT MEETING ON EUROPEAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE AND SYMPOSIUM ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ESEC/FSE '21), 2021, : 1630 - 1634
  • [28] How cross-functional teams go bad
    Hrickiewicz, M
    [J]. CHEMICAL PROCESSING, 1999, 62 (05): : 35 - 36
  • [29] Cross-functional teams and new product development
    Wilemon, D
    [J]. INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT - THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP, 1997, : 484 - 484
  • [30] Communication and Design Decisions in Cross-Functional Teams
    Awomolo, Olaitan
    Jabbariarfaei, Javaneh
    Singh, Nairiti
    Akin, Omer
    [J]. ANALYSING DESIGN THINKING: STUDIES OF CROSS-CULTURAL CO-CREATION, 2017, : 97 - 118