Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. Criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP)

被引:98
|
作者
Johnson, CA
Sample, PA
Cioffi, GA
Liebmann, JR
Weinreb, RN
机构
[1] Devers Eye Inst, Discoveries Slight Res Labs, Portland, OR 97210 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Glaucoma Ctr, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Visual Funct Lab, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] New York Eye & Ear Infirm, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01577-5
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To develop criteria for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss for standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. METHODS: Three populations were evaluated: (1) 348 normal subjects (348 eyes) were tested to develop nor, mative databases and statistical analysis packages for SAP and SWAP. (2) An independent group of 47 normal subjects (94 eyes) with 4 years of longitudinal follow-up was evaluated to determine specificity of different criteria. (3) A group of 298 patients (479 eyes) with elevated intraocular pressure and normal baseline SAP visual fields were evaluated to determine the sensitivity of different criteria for detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss. RESULTS: Six criteria demonstrated high specificity for correctly identifying eyes with normal visual fields (98%-100%) for both SAP and SWAP: (1) a pattern standard deviation (PSD) worse than the normal 1% level, (2) a glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) "outside normal limits," (3) one hemifield cluster worse than the normal 1% level, (4) two hemifield clusters worse than the normal 5% level, (5) four abnormal (P < .05) locations, (6) five abnormal locations (P < .05) on the pattern deviation probability plot. For all criteria, confirmation on a second visual field was required for high specificity. The GHT "outside normal limits," two hemi. field clusters worse than the normal 5% level and four abnormal (P < .05) test locations on the pattern deviation probability plot provided the highest percentages of conversion from a normal to a glaucomatous visual field. CONCLUSIONS: Criteria based on the GHT, GHT hemifield clusters, and the pattern deviation probability plot provide high sensitivity and specificity for detecting early glaucomatous visual field changes. (C) 2002 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 185
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine learning classifiers in the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma using short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP)
    Boden, C
    Chan, K
    Goldbaum, M
    Lee, TW
    Sejnowski, T
    Boehm, AG
    Aihara, M
    Weinreb, RN
    Sample, PA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 : U488 - U488
  • [32] Quantification of the Visual Field Loss in Retinitis Pigmentosa Using Semi-Automated Kinetic Perimetry
    Nowomiejska, Katarzyna
    Brzozowska, Agnieszka
    Koss, Michael J.
    Weleber, Richard G.
    Schiefer, Ulrich
    Rejdak, Konrad
    Juenemann, Anselm G.
    Maciejewski, Ryszard
    Rejdak, Robert
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2016, 41 (07) : 993 - 998
  • [33] Depth of Visual Field Loss Using Threshold Automated Perimetry Increases with Eccentricity in Glaucoma Subjects
    Wanzek, Robert
    Lee, Eric
    Eden, Trina
    Turpin, Andrew
    Chong, Luke
    Wall, Michael
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [34] Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras, Antonio
    Polo, Vicente
    Larrosa, Jose M.
    Pablo, Luis E.
    Pajarin, Ana B.
    Pueyo, Victoria
    Honrubia, Francisco M.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2007, 16 (04) : 372 - 383
  • [35] The benefit of combining standard automated perimetry and multifocal visual evoked potential hemifield intersector analysis in suspecious glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Mousa, Mohamed F.
    Cubbidge, Robert P.
    Al-Mansouri, Fatima
    Bener, Abdulbari
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2013, 24 (03): : 277 - 288
  • [36] Visual Function-Specific Perimetry to Identify Glaucomatous Visual Loss Using Three Different Definitions of Visual Field Abnormality
    Tafreshi, Ali
    Sample, Pamela A.
    Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
    Girkin, Christopher A.
    Zangwill, Linda M.
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Lalezary, Maziar
    Racette, Lyne
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (03) : 1234 - 1240
  • [37] Temporal Wedge Defects in Glaucoma: Structure/Function Correlation With Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field
    Wall, Michael
    Lee, Eric J.
    Wanzek, Robert J.
    Chong, Luke X.
    Turpin, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2020, 29 (03) : 191 - 197
  • [38] Evaluation of glaucomatous visual field loss with locally condensed grids using fundus-oriented perimetry (FOP)
    Schiefer, U
    Malsam, A
    Flad, M
    Stumpp, F
    Dietrich, TJ
    Paetzold, J
    Vonthein, R
    Knorr, M
    Denk, PO
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 11 : S57 - S62
  • [39] Comparison among Standard Automated Perimetry, Microperimetry and macular Spectral Domain-OCT in glaucomatous eyes with localized visual field defects
    Mosca, Monica
    Rossi, Alessandro
    Sala, Roberto
    Ratiglia, Roberto
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [40] Comparison of frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression. A longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes, SA
    Artes, PH
    Hutchison, DM
    McCormick, T
    Varma, DK
    Nicolela, MT
    LeBlanc, RP
    Chauhan, BC
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U146 - U146