The Effects of Contestability of Control on Korean's Firm Performance

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Hung Sik [1 ]
Cho, Kyung-Shick [1 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ Gyeongju Campus, Coll Management & Econ, 109-1411,163 Dongbuk Ro, Daegu 41519, South Korea
来源
关键词
Contestability of Control; Finn Performance; Blockholder; Ownership; Governance; MULTIPLE LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; AGENCY COSTS; BLOCKHOLDER; PROTECTION; STOCK;
D O I
10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.727
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship power distribution among several blockholders (contestability) and firm performance. We use a sample of 646 firms listed in the security markets of Korea from 2005 to 2007. Using different measures of contestability, we verify advance research literature by examining that, when power dispersion among several blockholders (contestability) increases, firm performance is enhanced. The results show that, when the possibility of a controlling coalition being formed among several blocks increases, the corporate value decreases. We also find that this relationship is even more significant in KOSDAQ. However, the smaller the competition of voting rights among blockholders, the higher the corporate performance in KOSPI. The reason for this seems to be that the two markets are different in terms of ownership and governance. This suggests that the effects of contestability among blockholders on firm performance depend on the type of the stock market. The results of this study expand the existing governance literature by analyzing the relationship between contestability among blockholders and film performance in emerging markets such as Korea. Our findings contribute to policymakers and investors who are interested in the relationship between contestability of control and firm performance in the Korea stock market.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 736
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agglomeration and firm performance: One firm's medicine is another firm's poison
    Knoben, J.
    Arikan, A. T.
    van Oort, F.
    Raspe, O.
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2016, 48 (01): : 132 - 153
  • [22] Private benefits of control and firm leverage: An analysis of Korean firms
    Kang J.
    Kim J.-S.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2006, 27 (4) : 439 - 463
  • [23] The importance of the firm and destination effects to explain firm performance
    Molina-Azorin, Jose F.
    Pereira-Moliner, Jorge
    Claver-Cortes, Enrique
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 31 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [24] THE IMPACTS OF MULTI-BLOCKHOLDER CONTESTABILITY AND COALITION ON THE RISK OF KOREAN COMPANIES
    Kim, Hung Sik
    Cho, Kyung-Shick
    ASIAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 18 (02): : 1 - 20
  • [25] Nonlinear effects of board characteristics on China's hotel firm performance
    Liang, Chunmei
    Chen, Ming-Hsiang
    Zhu, Di
    Kot, Hung Wan
    Yang, Zhandong
    TOURISM ECONOMICS, 2022, 28 (08) : 1998 - 2020
  • [26] Effects of Green Operations and Green Innovation on Firm's Environmental Performance
    Chen, Rong-Huei
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 13 (02): : 118 - 128
  • [27] Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q
    Bharadwaj, AS
    Bharadwaj, SG
    Konsynski, BR
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (07) : 1008 - 1024
  • [28] Disproportionate insider control and firm performance
    Hettler, Barry
    Forst, Arno
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2019, 59 (02): : 1101 - 1130
  • [29] Control Changes and Firm Performance in Banking
    Eugenia Delfino, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF BUSINESS, 2007, 14 (02) : 261 - 281
  • [30] The influence of the venture capitalist's governance activities on the entrepreneurial firm's control systems and performance
    Wijbenga, Frits H.
    Postma, Theo J. B. M.
    Stratling, Rebecca
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2007, 31 (02) : 257 - 277