The Effects of Contestability of Control on Korean's Firm Performance

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Hung Sik [1 ]
Cho, Kyung-Shick [1 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ Gyeongju Campus, Coll Management & Econ, 109-1411,163 Dongbuk Ro, Daegu 41519, South Korea
来源
关键词
Contestability of Control; Finn Performance; Blockholder; Ownership; Governance; MULTIPLE LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; AGENCY COSTS; BLOCKHOLDER; PROTECTION; STOCK;
D O I
10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.727
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship power distribution among several blockholders (contestability) and firm performance. We use a sample of 646 firms listed in the security markets of Korea from 2005 to 2007. Using different measures of contestability, we verify advance research literature by examining that, when power dispersion among several blockholders (contestability) increases, firm performance is enhanced. The results show that, when the possibility of a controlling coalition being formed among several blocks increases, the corporate value decreases. We also find that this relationship is even more significant in KOSDAQ. However, the smaller the competition of voting rights among blockholders, the higher the corporate performance in KOSPI. The reason for this seems to be that the two markets are different in terms of ownership and governance. This suggests that the effects of contestability among blockholders on firm performance depend on the type of the stock market. The results of this study expand the existing governance literature by analyzing the relationship between contestability among blockholders and film performance in emerging markets such as Korea. Our findings contribute to policymakers and investors who are interested in the relationship between contestability of control and firm performance in the Korea stock market.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 736
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Board structure, ownership and firm performance: Korean evidence
    Yu, BJ
    KORUS 2005, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 853 - 856
  • [12] The effects of politically connected outside directors on firm performance: Evidence from Korean chaebol firms
    Shin, Jae Yong
    Hyun, Jeong-Hoon
    Oh, Seungbin
    Yang, Hongsuk
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2018, 26 (01) : 23 - 44
  • [13] Inherited control and firm performance
    Perez-Gonzalez, Francisco
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (05): : 1559 - 1588
  • [14] Management control systems and real earnings management: Effects on firm performance
    Osma, Beatriz Garcia
    Gomez-Conde, Jacobo
    Lopez-Valeiras, Ernesto
    MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 55
  • [15] The Effects of Strategy-Management Control System Misfits on Firm Performance
    Gani, Lindawati
    Jermias, Johnny
    ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 11 (03) : 165 - 196
  • [16] Board size and firm performance: The moderating effects of the market for corporate control
    Cheng S.
    Evans III J.H.
    Nagarajan N.J.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2008, 31 (2) : 121 - 145
  • [17] The effects of cost and asset retrenchment on firm performance: The overlooked role of a firm's competitive environment
    Morrow, JL
    Johnson, RA
    Busenitz, LW
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2004, 30 (02) : 189 - 208
  • [18] Imitation, Technology, and Firm Performance: The Korean Firms Case in China
    Kim, Woo-Hyoung
    Chen, Bo
    Hwang, Jin-Soo
    JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE, 2021, 25 (04): : 128 - 145
  • [19] The effects of collateral on firm performance
    Ono, Arito
    Sakai, Koji
    Uesugi, Iichiro
    JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2012, 26 (01) : 84 - 109
  • [20] Munificence effects on firm performance
    De-Carvalho, Julia Pinto
    Dias, Alexandre Teixeira
    Monteiro Rossi, Flavia Silva
    REVISTA CIENCIAS ADMINISTRATIVAS, 2018, 24 (01):