Coevolution leaves a weak signal on ecological networks

被引:13
|
作者
Ponisio, Lauren C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
M'Gonigle, Leithen K. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, 130 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, BIDS, 190 Doe Lib, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Entomol, 417 Entomol Bldg, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, B-157, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2017年 / 8卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
bipartite; evolution; interaction intimacy; modularity; nestedness; phylogenetic interaction structure; FOOD WEBS; POLLINATION; NESTEDNESS; DIVERSIFICATION; ARCHITECTURE; CONSTRAINTS; MODULARITY; STABILITY; SPECIALIZATION; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.1798
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
One of the major challenges in evolutionary ecology is to understand how coevolution shapes species interaction networks. Important topological properties of networks such as nestedness and modularity are thought to be affected by coevolution. However, there has been no test whether coevolution does, in fact, lead to predictable network structure. Here, we investigate the structure of simulated bipartite networks generated under different modes of coevolution. We ask whether evolutionary processes influence network structure and, furthermore, whether any emergent trends are influenced by the strength or "intimacy" of the species interactions. We find that coevolution leaves a weak and variable signal on network topology, particularly nestedness and modularity, which was not strongly affected by the intimacy of interactions. Our findings indicate that network metrics, on their own, should not be used to make inferences about processes underlying the evolutionary history of communities. Instead, a more holistic approach that combines network approaches with traditional phylogenetic and biogeographic reconstructions is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Structural Model for the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior
    Hsieh, Chih-Sheng
    Koenig, Michael D.
    Liu, Xiaodong
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2022, 104 (02) : 355 - 367
  • [42] Coevolution of Opinion Dynamics in Evolving Networks
    Acosta-Escorcia, Diego
    Cusguen, Carlos
    Mojica-Nava, Eduardo
    2015 IEEE 2ND COLOMBIAN CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL (CCAC), 2015,
  • [43] Resilience and the Coevolution of Interdependent Multiplex Networks
    Ganguly, Auroop
    Mehta, Tanay
    Sundaram, Ravi
    Tiwari, Devesh
    2018 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM), 2018, : 226 - 233
  • [44] Coevolution of functional flow processing networks
    Pablo Kaluza
    The European Physical Journal B, 2017, 90
  • [45] Coevolution of functional flow processing networks
    Kaluza, Pablo
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2017, 90 (05):
  • [46] THE COEVOLUTION OF SOCIAL NETWORKS AND THOUGHTS OF QUITTING
    Troester, Christian
    Parker, Andrew
    Van Knippenberg, Daan
    Sahlmuller, Ben
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 62 (01): : 22 - 43
  • [47] The Coevolution of Trade Agreement Networks and Democracy
    Manger, Mark S.
    Pickup, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2016, 60 (01) : 164 - 191
  • [48] Consent or conflict: Coevolution of coordination and networks
    Buskens, Vincent
    Corten, Rense
    Weesie, Jeroen
    JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2008, 45 (02) : 205 - 222
  • [49] Stochastic resonance enhancing detectability of weak signal by neuronal networks model for receiver
    Liu, Jun
    Wu, Jian
    Lou, Zhengguo
    Li, Guang
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL NETWORKS - ISNN 2006, PT 1, 2006, 3971 : 15 - 20
  • [50] Detection of weak signal embedded in chaotic noise with chaos oscillator and neural networks
    Su Li-yun
    Ma Hong
    Tang Shi-fu
    Proceedings of 2006 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2006, : 259 - +