Coevolution leaves a weak signal on ecological networks

被引:13
|
作者
Ponisio, Lauren C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
M'Gonigle, Leithen K. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, 130 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, BIDS, 190 Doe Lib, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Entomol, 417 Entomol Bldg, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, B-157, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2017年 / 8卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
bipartite; evolution; interaction intimacy; modularity; nestedness; phylogenetic interaction structure; FOOD WEBS; POLLINATION; NESTEDNESS; DIVERSIFICATION; ARCHITECTURE; CONSTRAINTS; MODULARITY; STABILITY; SPECIALIZATION; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.1798
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
One of the major challenges in evolutionary ecology is to understand how coevolution shapes species interaction networks. Important topological properties of networks such as nestedness and modularity are thought to be affected by coevolution. However, there has been no test whether coevolution does, in fact, lead to predictable network structure. Here, we investigate the structure of simulated bipartite networks generated under different modes of coevolution. We ask whether evolutionary processes influence network structure and, furthermore, whether any emergent trends are influenced by the strength or "intimacy" of the species interactions. We find that coevolution leaves a weak and variable signal on network topology, particularly nestedness and modularity, which was not strongly affected by the intimacy of interactions. Our findings indicate that network metrics, on their own, should not be used to make inferences about processes underlying the evolutionary history of communities. Instead, a more holistic approach that combines network approaches with traditional phylogenetic and biogeographic reconstructions is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coevolution of Generative Adversarial Networks
    Costa, Victor
    Lourenco, Nuno
    Machado, Penousal
    APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, EVOAPPLICATIONS 2019, 2019, 11454 : 473 - 487
  • [22] The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes
    Lazer, David
    Rubineau, Brian
    Chetkovich, Carol
    Katz, Nancy
    Neblo, Michael
    POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2010, 27 (03) : 248 - 274
  • [23] Coevolution spreading in complex networks
    Wang, Wei
    Liu, Quan-Hui
    Liang, Junhao
    Hu, Yanqing
    Zhou, Tao
    PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2019, 820 : 1 - 51
  • [24] Weak signal transmission in complex networks and its application in detecting connectivity
    Liang, Xiaoming
    Liu, Zonghua
    Li, Baowen
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2009, 80 (04)
  • [25] Signal propagation in small-world biological networks with weak noise
    Hong, Dawei
    Man, Shushuang
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 262 (02) : 370 - 380
  • [26] Weak phylogenetic signal for specialisation in antagonistic liana-tree networks
    Sfair, Julia C.
    Rochelle, Andre L. C.
    Rezende, Andreia A.
    van Melis, Juliano
    Weiser, Veridiana de L.
    Martins, Fernando R.
    PLANT ECOLOGY & DIVERSITY, 2015, 8 (03) : 379 - 386
  • [27] Sexual difference in signal-receiver coevolution
    Morris, MR
    Ryan, MJ
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 52 : 1017 - 1024
  • [28] Coevolution of Neural Networks for Agents and Environments
    Chigot, Estelle
    Wilson, Dennis G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 2306 - 2309
  • [29] Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks
    Roth, Camille
    Cointet, Jean-Philippe
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2010, 32 (01) : 16 - 29
  • [30] Adaptive networks: Coevolution of disease and topology
    Marceau, Vincent
    Noel, Pierre-Andre
    Hebert-Dufresne, Laurent
    Allard, Antoine
    Dube, Louis J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 82 (03):