Who's favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election

被引：29

作者：

Baujard, Antoinette ^{[1
]}

Igersheim, Herrade ^{[2
,3
]}

Lebon, Isabelle ^{[4
,5
]}

Gavrel, Frederic ^{[4
,5
]}

Laslier, Jean-Francois ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Univ St Etienne, Univ Lyon, UMR CNRS 5824, GATE L SE, St Etiennne, France

[2] Univ Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France

[3] Univ Strasbourg, UMR CNRS 7522, BETA, Strasbourg, France

[4] Univ Caen Basse Normandie, CREM, UMR CNRS 6211, Caen, France

[5] Univ Caen Basse Normandie, Condorcet Ctr, Caen, France

[6] Paris Sch Econ, CNRS, UMR CNRS 8545, Paris, France

来源：

ELECTORAL STUDIES | 2014年 / 34卷

关键词：

Voting; In situ experiment; Evaluative voting; Approval voting; Two-round system; FIELD EXPERIMENT; APPROVAL;

D O I：

10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.003

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

Under evaluative voting, the voter freely grades each candidate on a numerical scale, with the winning candidate being determined by the sum of the grades they receive. This paper compares evaluative voting with the two-round system, reporting on an experiment, conducted during the 2012 French presidential election, which attracted 2340 participants. Here we show that the two-round system favors "exclusive" candidates, that is candidates who elicit strong feelings, while evaluative rules favor "inclusive" candidates, that is candidates who attract the support of a large span of the electorate. These differences are explained by two complementary reasons: the opportunity for the voter to support several candidates under evaluative voting rules, and the specific pattern of strategic voting under the two-round voting rule. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：131 / 145

页数：15

共 50 条

[31] Network Issue Agendas on Twitter During the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Vargo, Chris J.
Guo, Lei
McCombs, Maxwell
Shaw, Donald L.
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2014, 64 (02) : 296 - 316
[32] Partisan Media Selective Exposure During the 2012 Presidential Election
Wicks, Robert H.
Wicks, Jan L.
Morimoto, Shauna A.
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2014, 58 (09) : 1131 - 1143
[33] Not-so-strategic voters Evidence from an in situ experiment during the 2017 French presidential election
Baujard, Antoinette
Lebon, Isabelle
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2022, 76
[34] Green parties in hard times: The case of EELV in the 2012 French presidential election
Beaudonnet, Laurie
Vasilopoulos, Pavlos
PARTY POLITICS, 2014, 20 (02) : 275 - 285
[35] On expressive voting: Evidence from the 1988 U.S. presidential election
Kamhon Kan
C.C. Yang
Public Choice, 2001, 108 : 295 - 312
[36] Residential Context and Voting for the Far Right: The Impact of Immigration and Unemployment on the 2017 French Presidential Election
Pavlos Vasilopoulos
Haley McAvay
Sylvain Brouard
Political Behavior, 2022, 44 : 1703 - 1730
[37] Residential Context and Voting for the Far Right: The Impact of Immigration and Unemployment on the 2017 French Presidential Election
Vasilopoulos, Pavlos
McAvay, Haley
Brouard, Sylvain
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2022, 44 (04) : 1703 - 1730
[38] Le Pen's comeback: The 2002 French presidential election
Mayer, N
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 27 (02) : 455 - +
[39] The Racial Context of Convenience Voting Cutbacks: Early Voting in Ohio During the 2008 and 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections
Weaver, Russell
SAGE OPEN, 2015, 5 (03):
[40] Using Moral Foundations to Predict Voting Behavior: Regression Models from the 2012 US Presidential Election
Franks, Andrew S.
Scherr, Kyle C.
ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 15 (01) : 213 - 232

← 1 2 3 4 5 →