Exploring students' sensemaking of learning analytics dashboards: Does frame of reference make a difference?

被引:30
|
作者
Lim, Lisa [1 ]
Dawson, Shane [2 ]
Joksimovic, Srecko [1 ,2 ]
Gasevic, Dragan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Sch Educ, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ South Australia, Teaching Innovat Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Informat, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Learning dashboards; sensemaking; social comparison; epistemic network analysis; MOTIVATION; FEEDBACK; EMOTIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1145/3303772.3303804
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Learning Analytics Dashboards (LAD) are becoming an increasingly popular way to provide students with personalised feedback. Despite the number of LADs being developed, significant research gaps exist around the student perspective, especially how students make sense of graphics provided in LADs, and how they intend to act on the feedback provided therein. This study employed a randomized-controlled trial to examine students' sense-making of LADs showing four different frames of reference, and to what extent the impact of LADs was mediated by baseline self-regulation. Using a mix of quantitative and qualitative data analysis, the results revealed rather distinct patterns in students' sense-making across the four LADs. These patterns involved the intersection of visual salience and planned learning actions. However, collectively, across all four LADs a consistent theme emerged around students planned learning actions. This theme was classified as time and study environment management. A key finding of the study is that the use of LADs as a primary feedback process should be personalized and include training and support to aid student sensemaking.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 259
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reference frames for learning analytics dashboards: The progress and social reference frame and occupational self-efficacy
    Gallagher, Timothy
    Slof, Bert
    van der Schaaf, Marieke
    Toyoda, Ryo
    Tehreem, Yusra
    Fracaro, Sofia Garcia
    Kester, Liesbeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2024, 40 (02) : 742 - 760
  • [2] Adapting Learning Analytics Dashboards by and for University Students
    Oliver-Quelennec, Katia
    Bouchet, Francois
    Carron, Thibault
    Casalino, Kathy Fronton
    Pincon, Claire
    [J]. EDUCATING FOR A NEW FUTURE: MAKING SENSE OF TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING ADOPTION, EC-TEL 2022, 2022, 13450 : 299 - 309
  • [3] Towards Optimization of Learning Analytics Dashboards That are Customized for the Students' Requirements
    Israel-Fishelson, Rotem
    Kohen-Vacs, Dan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 17 : 794 - 802
  • [4] To Arouse Students' Interest in Learning: Does Inquiry Based Learning Make a Difference
    Andy, Chun Wai Fan
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT, AND LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING (TALE), 2015, : 295 - 300
  • [5] How Students Use Learning Analytics Dashboards in Higher Education: A Learning Performance Perspective
    Chen, Li
    Geng, Xuewang
    Lu, Min
    Shimada, Atsushi
    Yamada, Masanori
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [6] Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Poverty Does Experiential Learning Make a Difference?
    Vliem, Sally
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATOR, 2015, 40 (06) : 308 - 312
  • [7] Promoting students' digital health literacy: does learning in school make a difference?
    Renninger, D.
    Stauch, L.
    Fischer, L.
    Hartmann, A.
    Ranow, P.
    Dadacznyski, K.
    Okan, O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [8] Games for Learning: Does Gender Make a Difference?
    Boyle, Elizabeth
    Connolly, Thomas
    [J]. 2ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON GAMES BASED LEARNING, 2008, : 69 - 76
  • [9] Learning to listen: does intervention make a difference?
    Lotfi, Ghazal
    Maftoon, Parviz
    Birjandi, Parviz
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING JOURNAL, 2016, 44 (01): : 107 - 123
  • [10] GENDER AND LEARNING - DOES EMOTION MAKE A DIFFERENCE
    INGLETON, C
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 1995, 30 (03) : 323 - 335