Quantum Semantic Learning by Reverse Annealing of an Adiabatic Quantum Computer

被引:21
|
作者
Rocutto, Lorenzo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Destri, Claudio [2 ]
Prati, Enrico [1 ]
机构
[1] CNR, Ist Foton & Nanotecnol, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento Fis, Piazza Sci 3, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[3] Dipartimento Farm & Biotecnol, Via Belmeloro 6, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
关键词
adiabatic quantum computer; Boltzmann machine; reverse annealing; semantic learning;
D O I
10.1002/qute.202000133
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs) constitute a class of neural networks for unsupervised learning with applications ranging from pattern classification to quantum state reconstruction. Despite the potential representative power, the diffusion of RBMs is quite limited since their training process proves to be hard. The advent of commercial adiabatic quantum computers (AQCs) raised the expectation that the implementations of RBMs on such quantum devices can increase the training speed with respect to conventional hardware. Here, the feasibility of a complete RBM on AQCs is demonstrated, thanks to an embedding that associates the nodes of the neural networks to virtual qubits. A semantic quantum search is implemented thanks to a reverse annealing schedule. Such an approach exploits more information from the training data, mimicking the behavior of the classical Gibbs sampling algorithm. The semantic training is shown to quickly raise the sampling probability of a subset of the set of the configurations. Even without a proper optimization of the annealing schedule, the RBM semantically trained achieves good scores on reconstruction tasks. The development of such techniques paves the way toward the establishment of a quantum advantage of adiabatic quantum computers, especially given the foreseen improvement of such hardware.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Standard quantum annealing outperforms adiabatic reverse annealing with decoherence
    Passarelli, Gianluca
    Yip, Ka-Wa
    Lidar, Daniel A.
    Lucignano, Procolo
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2022, 105 (03)
  • [2] Adiabatic quantum learning
    Ma, Nannan
    Chu, Wenhao
    Zhao, P. Z.
    Gong, Jiangbin
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2023, 108 (04)
  • [3] LEARNING QUANTUM OPERATOR BY QUANTUM ADIABATIC COMPUTATION
    Liu, Ding
    Jiang, Minghu
    [J]. 2014 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICSP), 2014, : 63 - 67
  • [4] Factoring on a quantum annealing computer
    Warren, Richard H.
    [J]. Quantum Information and Computation, 2019, 19 (3-4): : 252 - 261
  • [5] FACTORING ON A QUANTUM ANNEALING COMPUTER
    Warren, Richard H.
    [J]. QUANTUM INFORMATION & COMPUTATION, 2019, 19 (3-4) : 252 - 261
  • [6] Decoherence in a scalable adiabatic quantum computer
    Ashhab, S.
    Johansson, J. R.
    Nori, Franco
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2006, 74 (05):
  • [7] Multiobjective Optimization in a Quantum Adiabatic Computer
    Baran, Benjamin
    Villagra, Marcos
    [J]. ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 329 (329) : 27 - 38
  • [8] Adiabatic Circuits for Quantum Computer Control
    DeBenedictis, Erik P.
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REBOOTING COMPUTING (ICRC 2020), 2020, : 42 - 49
  • [9] LEARNING QUANTUM ANNEALING
    Behrman, E. C.
    Steck, J. E.
    Moustafa, M. A.
    [J]. QUANTUM INFORMATION & COMPUTATION, 2017, 17 (5-6) : 469 - 487
  • [10] Statistical Analysis for Quantum Adiabatic Computations: Quantum Monte Carlo Annealing
    Neuhaus, T.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH WORKSHOP ON COMPUTER SIMULATION STUDIES IN CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS (CSP2011), 2011, 15 : 71 - 75