Improved Characterization of Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis by Topographic Analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Hardmeier, Martin [1 ]
Hatz, Florian [1 ]
Naegelin, Yvonne [1 ]
Hight, Darren [1 ]
Schindler, Christian [2 ]
Kappos, Ludwig [1 ]
Seeck, Margitta [3 ]
Michel, Christoph M. [4 ]
Fuhr, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Neurol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Trop & Publ Hlth Inst, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Geneva, Neurol Clin, EEG & Epilepsy Unit, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Dept Basic & Clin Neurosci, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Visual evoked potentials; Topographic analysis; Quantification; Surrogate marker; OPTIC NEURITIS; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; DISABILITY; BRAIN; RESPONSES; EYE; STIMULATION; ERP;
D O I
10.1007/s10548-013-0318-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
In multiple sclerosis (MS), the combination of visual, somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (EP) has been shown to be highly correlated with the Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS) and to predict the disease course. In the present study, we explored whether the significance of the visual EP (VEP) can be improved with multichannel recordings (204 electrodes) and topographic analysis (tVEP). VEPs were analyzed in 83 MS patients (median EDSS 2.0; 52 % with history of optic neuritis; hON) and 47 healthy controls (HC). TVEP components were automatically defined on the basis of spatial similarity between the scalp potential fields (topographic maps) of single subjects' VEPs and reference maps generated from HC. Non-ambiguous measures of latency, amplitude and configuration were derived from the maps reflecting the P100 component. TVEP was compared to conventional analysis (cVEP) with respect to reliability in HC, validity using descriptors of logistic regression models, and sensitivity derived from receiver operating characteristics curves. In tVEP, reliability tended to be higher for measurement of amplitude (p = 0.06). Regression models on diagnosis (MS vs. HC) and hON were more favorable using tVEP- versus cVEP-predictors. Sensitivity was increased in tVEP versus cVEP: 72 % versus 60 % for diagnosis, and 88 % versus 77 % for hON. The advantage of tVEP was most pronounced in pathological VEPs, in which cVEPs were often ambiguous. TVEP is a reliable, valid, and sensitive method of objectively quantifying pathological VEP in particular. In combination with other EP modalities, tVEP may improve the monitoring of disease course in MS.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 327
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
    Chirapapaisan, Niphon
    Laotaweerungsawat, Sawarin
    Chuenkongkaew, Wanicha
    Samsen, Patthanee
    Ruangvaravate, Ngamkae
    Thuangtong, Atiporn
    Chanvarapha, Nacha
    DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2015, 130 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [42] Multiple sclerosis: Relationships between cytokines, visual evoked potentials and disability
    Tasdemir, N.
    Karaca, E. E.
    Ece, A.
    Tasdemir, M. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 13 : 279 - 279
  • [43] Multifocal visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: A review
    Pihl-Jensen, G.
    Schmidt, M. Falck
    Frederiksen, J. Lautrup
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 601 - 601
  • [44] The role of multifocal visual evoked potentials in understanding disability in multiple sclerosis
    Martinez-Lapiscina, E. H.
    Tercero-Uribe, A. I.
    Alba-Arbalat, S.
    Sola-Valls, N.
    Andorra, M.
    Sepulveda, M.
    Guerrero-Zamora, A. M.
    Torres-Torres, R.
    Llufriu, S.
    Zubizarreta, I.
    Blanco, Y.
    Sanchez-Dalmau, B.
    Saiz, A.
    Santamaria, J.
    Villoslada, P.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 : 465 - 466
  • [45] VISUAL FATIGUE AND VISUALLY EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    不详
    LANCET, 1984, 2 (8405): : 731 - 732
  • [46] Sensitivity of optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis
    Di Maggio, G.
    Mariangela, B.
    Santangelo, R.
    Ferrari, L.
    Guerrieri, S.
    Medaglini, S.
    Rodegher, M.
    Colombo, B.
    Moiola, L.
    Del Carro, U.
    Martinelli, V.
    Comi, G.
    Leocani, L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2013, 260 : S203 - S203
  • [47] VALUE OF VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS (MS)
    MAUGUIERE, F
    MITROU, H
    CHALET, E
    POURCHER, E
    COURJON, J
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 50 (5-6): : P199 - P199
  • [48] Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in progressive multiple sclerosis
    Guerrieri, S.
    Girola, S.
    Pisa, M.
    Huang, S. C.
    Santangelo, R.
    Moiola, L.
    Martinelli, V.
    Comi, G.
    Leocani, L.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2019, 25 : 483 - 484
  • [49] Visual Evoked Potentials as a Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis and Associated Optic Neuritis
    Leocani, Letizia
    Guerrieri, Simone
    Comi, Giancarlo
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 38 (03) : 350 - 357
  • [50] Diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
    Niphon Chirapapaisan
    Sawarin Laotaweerungsawat
    Wanicha Chuenkongkaew
    Patthanee Samsen
    Ngamkae Ruangvaravate
    Atiporn Thuangtong
    Nacha Chanvarapha
    Documenta Ophthalmologica, 2015, 130 : 25 - 30