Improved Characterization of Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis by Topographic Analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Hardmeier, Martin [1 ]
Hatz, Florian [1 ]
Naegelin, Yvonne [1 ]
Hight, Darren [1 ]
Schindler, Christian [2 ]
Kappos, Ludwig [1 ]
Seeck, Margitta [3 ]
Michel, Christoph M. [4 ]
Fuhr, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Neurol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Trop & Publ Hlth Inst, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Geneva, Neurol Clin, EEG & Epilepsy Unit, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Dept Basic & Clin Neurosci, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Visual evoked potentials; Topographic analysis; Quantification; Surrogate marker; OPTIC NEURITIS; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; DISABILITY; BRAIN; RESPONSES; EYE; STIMULATION; ERP;
D O I
10.1007/s10548-013-0318-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
In multiple sclerosis (MS), the combination of visual, somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (EP) has been shown to be highly correlated with the Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS) and to predict the disease course. In the present study, we explored whether the significance of the visual EP (VEP) can be improved with multichannel recordings (204 electrodes) and topographic analysis (tVEP). VEPs were analyzed in 83 MS patients (median EDSS 2.0; 52 % with history of optic neuritis; hON) and 47 healthy controls (HC). TVEP components were automatically defined on the basis of spatial similarity between the scalp potential fields (topographic maps) of single subjects' VEPs and reference maps generated from HC. Non-ambiguous measures of latency, amplitude and configuration were derived from the maps reflecting the P100 component. TVEP was compared to conventional analysis (cVEP) with respect to reliability in HC, validity using descriptors of logistic regression models, and sensitivity derived from receiver operating characteristics curves. In tVEP, reliability tended to be higher for measurement of amplitude (p = 0.06). Regression models on diagnosis (MS vs. HC) and hON were more favorable using tVEP- versus cVEP-predictors. Sensitivity was increased in tVEP versus cVEP: 72 % versus 60 % for diagnosis, and 88 % versus 77 % for hON. The advantage of tVEP was most pronounced in pathological VEPs, in which cVEPs were often ambiguous. TVEP is a reliable, valid, and sensitive method of objectively quantifying pathological VEP in particular. In combination with other EP modalities, tVEP may improve the monitoring of disease course in MS.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 327
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of motor evoked potentials with visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    Ozbek, B.
    Balci, K.
    Celik, Y.
    Asil, T.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 285 : S199 - S200
  • [32] Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis
    Kraft, George H.
    PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 24 (04) : 717 - +
  • [33] MRI and visual-evoked potentials in partners of multiple sclerosis patients
    Hawkes, C. H.
    Chawda, S.
    Derakshani, S.
    Muhammed, N.
    Visentin, E.
    Boniface, D.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 125 (06): : 424 - 430
  • [34] VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS (VEP) AND MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS (MS)
    TAGHAVY, A
    NERVENHEILKUNDE, 1984, 3 (02) : 66 - 71
  • [35] VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS AND QUANTITATIVE PERIMETRY IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    ELLENBERGER, C
    ZIEGLER, SB
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1977, 1 (06) : 561 - 564
  • [36] Role of visual evoked potentials in spatial dissemination for multiple sclerosis diagnosis
    Fenu, G.
    Lorefice, L.
    Coghe, G.
    Frau, J.
    Arru, M.
    Maggiore, C.
    Marrosu, M. G.
    Cocco, E.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 : 684 - 685
  • [37] VISUAL AND SPINAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    MASTAGLIA, FL
    BLACK, JL
    COLLINS, DWK
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 2 (6038): : 732 - 732
  • [38] Visual evoked potentials and optic coherence tomography in monitoring multiple sclerosis
    Leocani, L.
    Guerrieri, S.
    Di Maggio, G.
    Santangelo, R.
    Ferrari, L.
    Medaglini, S.
    Rodegher, M.
    Colombo, B.
    Lucia, M.
    Del Carro, U.
    Martinelli, V.
    Comi, G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 261 : S37 - S38
  • [39] Multifocal visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: A review
    Pihl-Jensen, Gorm
    Schmidt, Mathias Falck
    Frederiksen, Jette Lautrup
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (07) : 1234 - 1245
  • [40] Visual evoked potentials and optic coherence tomography in monitoring multiple sclerosis
    Leocani, L.
    Guerrieri, S.
    Di Maggio, G.
    Santangelo, R.
    Ferrari, L.
    Medaglini, S.
    Rodegher, M.
    Colombo, B.
    Lucia, M.
    Del Carro, U.
    Martinelli, V.
    Comi, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 21 : 50 - 50