Effect of Ridge Morphology on Guided Bone Regeneration Outcome: Conventional Tomographic Study

被引:22
|
作者
Park, Sang-Hoon [1 ]
Brooks, Sharon L. [2 ,3 ]
Oh, Tae-Ju [2 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont, Baltimore Coll Dent Surg, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Bone regeneration; dental implant; morphology; tomography; MEMBRANES; IMPLANTS; AUGMENTATION; DEFECTS; CLASSIFICATION; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2009.090090
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: This study retrospectively analyzed conventional tomograms to estimate the prognostic value of the cross-sectional ridge morphology on the clinical outcome of guided bone regeneration (GBR). Methods: Presurgical conventional tomograms of 23 single-implant sites were analyzed retrospectively in 20 patients. All sites had a non-space-making buccal dehiscence defect associated with the subsequently placed dental implant. Simultaneous GBR procedures were performed, and 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed. Measurements at baseline and at the 6-month reentry included defect height (from smooth-rough junction to the most apical part of the defect) and horizontal bone gain at three locations (smooth-rough junction, middle, and most apical portion of the defect). All measurements were taken from a reference template. Tomographic parameters included the implant-associated ridge angle and width measured at 6 mm below the alveolar crest and at the most apical point of the implant. Implant exposure and the presence of the barrier membrane were controlled for during statistical analyses. Results: The presurgical ridge angle had a significant negative correlation with the percentage of defect height reduction (r = -0.621; P = 0.002) and horizontal bone gain (r = -0.469; P = 0.024). This difference remained significant even after controlling for implant/membrane exposure (P = 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). A statistically and clinically greater percentage of defect height reduction was observed for ridge angles <280 (P = 0.023). Ridge width did not have a significant effect on the regenerative outcome. Conclusion: Cross-sectional presurgical ridge angles may have prognostic value in estimating the outcome of simultaneous GBR. J Periodontol 2009;80:1231-1236.
引用
收藏
页码:1231 / 1236
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of bone inhibitors on periosteum-guided cartilage regeneration
    Hsiao, Hui-Yi
    Cheng, Chao-Min
    Kao, Shu-Wei
    Liu, Jia-Wei
    Chang, Chun-Shin
    Harhaus, Leila
    Huang, Jung-Ju
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [42] Effect of the surface morphology of silk fibroin scaffolds for bone regeneration
    Bhawal, Ujjal K.
    Uchida, Ryoichiro
    Kuboyama, Noboru
    Asakura, Tetsuo
    Hiratuska, Koichi
    Nishiyama, Norihiro
    BIO-MEDICAL MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 27 (04) : 413 - 424
  • [43] THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GUIDED BONE REGENERATION USING VARIOUS OF BONE GRAFT MATERIALS
    Kim, Young-Kyun
    Kim, Su-Gwan
    Lim, Seung-Cheoul
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2007, 33 (04) : 350 - 358
  • [44] The Effect and the Potential Use of Magnetic-Dam Barrier in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Laboratory Study
    Meme, Lucia
    Bambini, Fabrizio
    Gallusi, Gianni
    Sartini, Davide
    Pozzi, Valentina
    Emanuelli, Monica
    Strappa, Enrico M.
    Mummolo, Stefano
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [45] Bilateral Vertical Ridge Augmentation With Block Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration in the Posterior Vandible: A Case Report
    Penarrocha, Maria A.
    Vina, Jose A.
    Maestre, Laura
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 38 (01) : 533 - 537
  • [46] LOCALIZED RIDGE AUGMENTATION USING GUIDED BONE REGENERATION .2. SURGICAL-PROCEDURE IN THE MANDIBLE
    BUSER, D
    DULA, K
    BELSER, UC
    HIRT, HP
    BERTHOLD, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 1995, 15 (01) : 11 - 29
  • [47] Treatment Outcome of Using Guided Bone Regeneration for Bone Augmentation for the Placement of Dental Implants - A Systematic Review
    Chandrasekaran, Deepak
    Chinnaswami, Ravindran
    Malathi, N.
    Jayakumar, N. D.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S3068 - S3070
  • [48] Experimental study of a new biomembrane (MES) for guided bone regeneration
    Gomes, Raquel Zita
    Guerra, Isabel
    Afonso, Americo
    Fernandes, Maria Helena
    Vasconcelos, Mario
    Felino, Antonio
    Cavalheiro, Jose
    BIODENTAL ENGINEERING IV, 2018, : 117 - 122
  • [49] Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration:: effect of tissue occlusion on alveolar bone regeneration with guided tissue regeneration
    Polimeni, G
    Koo, KT
    Qahash, M
    Xiropaidis, AV
    Albandar, JM
    Wikesjö, UME
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (09) : 730 - 735
  • [50] Histocytological study of the guided bone regeneration using the rat mandible
    Masatoshi Sawaguchi
    Osami Morita
    Shigaku, 1999, 86 (4) : 863 - 880