Effect of Ridge Morphology on Guided Bone Regeneration Outcome: Conventional Tomographic Study

被引:22
|
作者
Park, Sang-Hoon [1 ]
Brooks, Sharon L. [2 ,3 ]
Oh, Tae-Ju [2 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont, Baltimore Coll Dent Surg, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Bone regeneration; dental implant; morphology; tomography; MEMBRANES; IMPLANTS; AUGMENTATION; DEFECTS; CLASSIFICATION; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2009.090090
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: This study retrospectively analyzed conventional tomograms to estimate the prognostic value of the cross-sectional ridge morphology on the clinical outcome of guided bone regeneration (GBR). Methods: Presurgical conventional tomograms of 23 single-implant sites were analyzed retrospectively in 20 patients. All sites had a non-space-making buccal dehiscence defect associated with the subsequently placed dental implant. Simultaneous GBR procedures were performed, and 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed. Measurements at baseline and at the 6-month reentry included defect height (from smooth-rough junction to the most apical part of the defect) and horizontal bone gain at three locations (smooth-rough junction, middle, and most apical portion of the defect). All measurements were taken from a reference template. Tomographic parameters included the implant-associated ridge angle and width measured at 6 mm below the alveolar crest and at the most apical point of the implant. Implant exposure and the presence of the barrier membrane were controlled for during statistical analyses. Results: The presurgical ridge angle had a significant negative correlation with the percentage of defect height reduction (r = -0.621; P = 0.002) and horizontal bone gain (r = -0.469; P = 0.024). This difference remained significant even after controlling for implant/membrane exposure (P = 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). A statistically and clinically greater percentage of defect height reduction was observed for ridge angles <280 (P = 0.023). Ridge width did not have a significant effect on the regenerative outcome. Conclusion: Cross-sectional presurgical ridge angles may have prognostic value in estimating the outcome of simultaneous GBR. J Periodontol 2009;80:1231-1236.
引用
收藏
页码:1231 / 1236
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of guided bone regeneration on bone quality surrounding dental implants
    Johnson, Trenton B.
    Siderits, Ben
    Nye, Seth
    Jeong, Yong-Hoon
    Han, Seung-Hee
    Rhyu, In-Chul
    Han, Jung-Suk
    Deguchi, Toru
    Beck, F. Michael
    Kim, Do-Gyoon
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 80 : 166 - 170
  • [22] Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study
    Tang, Yu-Long
    Yuan, Jing
    Song, Ying-Liang
    Ma, Wei
    Chao, Xie
    Li, De-Hua
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (02) : 204 - 211
  • [23] Volumetric changes in edentulous alveolar ridge sites utilizing guided bone regeneration and a custom titanium ridge augmentation matrix (CTRAM): a case series study
    Hofferber, Craig E.
    Beck, J. Cameron
    Liacouras, Peter C.
    Wessel, Jeffrey R.
    Getka, Thu P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [24] Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier - An experimental study in the monkey
    Hurzeler, MB
    Quinones, CR
    Hutmacher, D
    Schupbach, P
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (04) : 323 - 331
  • [25] Volumetric changes in edentulous alveolar ridge sites utilizing guided bone regeneration and a custom titanium ridge augmentation matrix (CTRAM): a case series study
    Craig E. Hofferber
    J. Cameron Beck
    Peter C. Liacouras
    Jeffrey R. Wessel
    Thu P. Getka
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6
  • [26] Bone reconstruction following implantation of rhBMP-2 and guided bone regeneration in canine alveolar ridge defects
    Jovanovic, Sascha A.
    Hunt, Dennis R.
    Bernard, George W.
    Spiekermann, Hubertus
    Wozney, John M.
    Wikesjoe, Ulf M. E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (02) : 224 - 230
  • [27] Guided Bone Regeneration of Femoral Segmental Defects using Equine Bone Graft: An In-Vivo Micro-Computed Tomographic Study in Rats
    Binsalah, Mohammed Awadh
    Ramalingam, Sundar
    Alkindi, Mohammed
    Nooh, Nasser
    Al-Hezaimi, Khalid
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (05) : 456 - 466
  • [28] IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF TISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH GUIDED BONE REGENERATION
    PARRY, DA
    JACKSON, WJ
    BARTOLD, PM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 752 - 752
  • [29] Guided bone regeneration with titanium membranes: a clinical study
    Watzinger, F
    Luksch, J
    Millesi, W
    Schopper, C
    Neugebauer, J
    Moser, D
    Ewers, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 38 (04): : 312 - 315
  • [30] The effect of experimental diabetes and membrane occlusiveness on guided bone regeneration: A proof of principle study
    Aristodemou, E.
    Retzepi, M.
    Calciolari, E.
    Donos, N.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (08) : 5223 - 5235