Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients

被引:153
|
作者
Lin, Keh-chung [1 ,2 ]
Hsieh, Yu-wei [1 ]
Wu, Ching-yi [3 ,7 ]
Chen, Chia-ling [4 ]
Jang, Yuh [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jung-sen [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[5] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Med Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Chang Gung Univ, Grad Inst Clin Behav Sci, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
关键词
Minimal detectable change; Clinically important difference; Outcome measures; Upper extremity; Stroke rehabilitation; Wolf Motor Function Test; INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION; MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE; KINEMATIC ANALYSIS; EXCITE TRIAL; RESPONSIVENESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RECOVERY; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/1545968308331144
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. This study aimed to establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) and clinically important differences (CID) of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) in patients with stroke, and to assess the proportions of patients' change scores exceeding the MDC and CID after stroke rehabilitation. Methods. A total of 57 patients received 1 of the 3 treatments for 3 weeks and underwent clinical assessments before and after treatment. The MDC, at 90% confidence (MDC90), was calculated from the standard error of measurement to indicate a real change for individual patients. Anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were used to triangulate the values of minimal CID. The percentages of patients exceeding the MDC and minimal CID were also examined. Results. The MDC90 of the WMFT was 4.36 for the performance time (WMFT time) and 0.37 for the functional ability scale (WMFT FAS). The minimal CID ranged from 1.5 to 2 seconds on the WMFT time and from 0.2 to 0.4 points on the WMFT FAS. The MDC and CID proportions ranged from 14% to 30% on the WMFT time and from 39% to 65% on the WMFT FAS, respectively. Conclusions. The change score of an individual patient has to reach 4.36 and 0.37 on the WMFT time and WMFT FAS to indicate a real change. The mean change scores of a stroke group on the WMFT time and WMFT FAS should achieve 1.5 to 2 seconds and 0.2 to 0.4 points to be regarded as clinically important changes. Furthermore, the WMFT FAS may be more responsive than the WMFT time based on the results of proportions exceeding the threshold criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 434
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of an Upper Extremity Recovery Measure in Subacute Stroke Patients
    Arya, Kamal Narayan
    Verma, Rajesh
    Garg, R. K.
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2011, 18 : 599 - 610
  • [42] Establishing the Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Minimal Detectable Change for the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
    Wright, Cynthia J.
    Linens, Shelley W.
    Cain, M. Spencer
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 98 (09): : 1806 - 1811
  • [43] Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
    Katajapuu, Niina
    Heinonen, Ari
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 34 (12) : 1506 - 1511
  • [44] The EXCITE trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke
    Wolf, SL
    Thompson, PA
    Morris, DA
    Rose, DK
    Winstein, CJ
    Taub, E
    Giuliani, C
    Pearson, SL
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2005, 19 (03) : 194 - 205
  • [45] Wolf Motor Function Test for Characterizing Moderate to Severe Hemiparesis in Stroke Patients
    Hodics, Timea M.
    Nakatsuka, Kyle
    Upreti, Bhim
    Alex, Arun
    Smith, Patricia S.
    Pezzullo, John C.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (11): : 1963 - 1967
  • [46] Responsiveness, Minimal Detectable Change, and Minimally Clinically Important Differences for the Disorders of Consciousness Scale
    Mallinson, Trudy
    Pape, Theresa Louise-Bender
    Guernon, Ann
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2016, 31 (04) : E43 - E51
  • [47] An Application of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Test for the Diabetes Distress Scale
    Banks, J.
    Amspoker, A. B.
    Woodard, L.
    Naik, A. D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 : S244 - S244
  • [48] The Severe Asthma Questionnaire: sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference
    Masoli, Matthew
    Lanario, Joseph W.
    Hyland, Michael E.
    Menzies-Gow, Andrew
    Mansur, Adel H.
    Allen, David
    Dodd, James W.
    Hayes, Gemma
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Lamb, Sarah E.
    Jones, Rupert C.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 57 (06)
  • [49] Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
    Salas Apaza, Julieta Aldana
    Ariel Franco, Juan Victor
    Meza, Nicolas
    Madrid, Eva
    Loezar, Cristobal
    Garegnani, Luis
    MEDWAVE, 2021, 21 (03):
  • [50] The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: Response
    Franceschini, Marco
    Boffa, Angelo
    Pignotti, Elettra
    Andriolo, Luca
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Filardo, Giuseppe
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (13): : NP52 - NP52