Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients

被引:153
|
作者
Lin, Keh-chung [1 ,2 ]
Hsieh, Yu-wei [1 ]
Wu, Ching-yi [3 ,7 ]
Chen, Chia-ling [4 ]
Jang, Yuh [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jung-sen [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[5] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Med Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Chang Gung Univ, Grad Inst Clin Behav Sci, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
关键词
Minimal detectable change; Clinically important difference; Outcome measures; Upper extremity; Stroke rehabilitation; Wolf Motor Function Test; INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION; MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE; KINEMATIC ANALYSIS; EXCITE TRIAL; RESPONSIVENESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RECOVERY; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/1545968308331144
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. This study aimed to establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) and clinically important differences (CID) of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) in patients with stroke, and to assess the proportions of patients' change scores exceeding the MDC and CID after stroke rehabilitation. Methods. A total of 57 patients received 1 of the 3 treatments for 3 weeks and underwent clinical assessments before and after treatment. The MDC, at 90% confidence (MDC90), was calculated from the standard error of measurement to indicate a real change for individual patients. Anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were used to triangulate the values of minimal CID. The percentages of patients exceeding the MDC and minimal CID were also examined. Results. The MDC90 of the WMFT was 4.36 for the performance time (WMFT time) and 0.37 for the functional ability scale (WMFT FAS). The minimal CID ranged from 1.5 to 2 seconds on the WMFT time and from 0.2 to 0.4 points on the WMFT FAS. The MDC and CID proportions ranged from 14% to 30% on the WMFT time and from 39% to 65% on the WMFT FAS, respectively. Conclusions. The change score of an individual patient has to reach 4.36 and 0.37 on the WMFT time and WMFT FAS to indicate a real change. The mean change scores of a stroke group on the WMFT time and WMFT FAS should achieve 1.5 to 2 seconds and 0.2 to 0.4 points to be regarded as clinically important changes. Furthermore, the WMFT FAS may be more responsive than the WMFT time based on the results of proportions exceeding the threshold criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 434
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important change of the Pediatric Motor Activity Log in children with cerebral palsy
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Chen, Hui-fang
    Chen, Chia-ling
    Wang, Tien-ni
    Wu, Ching-yi
    Hsieh, Yu-wei
    Wu, Li-ling
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2012, 33 (02) : 570 - 577
  • [22] Minimal clinically important difference for the Motor Function Measure in patients with congenital muscular dystrophy and congenital myopathy
    Le Goff, L.
    Fink, M.
    Norato, G.
    Rippert, P.
    Meilleur, K.
    Foley, A. R.
    Jain, M.
    Waite, M.
    Donkervoort, S.
    Bonnemann, C.
    Vuillerot, C.
    NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 28 : S129 - S129
  • [23] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-Minute Walk Test in People With Stroke
    Fulk, George D.
    He, Ying
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 42 (04): : 235 - 240
  • [24] THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE OF THE COPD ASSESSMENT TEST
    Kon, S. S. C.
    Canavan, J. L.
    Clark, A. L.
    Jones, S. E.
    Nolan, C. M.
    Polkey, M. I.
    Man, W. D. C.
    THORAX, 2013, 68 : A89 - A90
  • [25] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Chen, Chung-Yao
    Chen, Hsieh-Ching
    Wu, Ching-Yi
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Hsieh, Yu-Wei
    Shen, I-Hsuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 55 (06) : 754 - 760
  • [26] The minimal clinically important difference of the mini-balance evaluation systems test in patients with early subacute stroke
    Takeda, Ren
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Igarashi, Tatsuya
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2023, 30 (07) : 672 - 680
  • [27] Is the difference real, is the difference relevant: the minimal detectable and clinically important changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
    Lindvall, Elias
    Abzhandadze, Tamar
    Quinn, Terence J.
    Sunnerhagen, Katharina S.
    Lundstrom, Erik
    CEREBRAL CIRCULATION-COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR, 2024, 6
  • [28] Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    Gatchel, Robert J.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Mayer, Tom G.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (19) : 1739 - 1743
  • [29] Definition of Nonresponse to Analgesic Treatment of Arthritic Pain: An Analytical Literature Review of the Smallest Detectable Difference, the Minimal Detectable Change, and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Pain Visual Analog Scale
    Stauffer, Melissa E.
    Taylor, Stephanie D.
    Watson, Douglas J.
    Peloso, Paul M.
    Morrison, Alan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION, 2011, 2011
  • [30] Minimal clinically important difference of the 6-min walking test in patients with asthma
    Zampogna, E.
    Ambrosino, N.
    Centis, R.
    Cherubino, F.
    Migliori, G. B.
    Pignatti, P.
    Lo Bello, G.
    Saderi, L.
    Sotgiu, G.
    Zappa, M.
    Spanevello, A.
    Visca, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2021, 25 (03) : 215 - +