Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients

被引:153
|
作者
Lin, Keh-chung [1 ,2 ]
Hsieh, Yu-wei [1 ]
Wu, Ching-yi [3 ,7 ]
Chen, Chia-ling [4 ]
Jang, Yuh [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jung-sen [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[5] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Med Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Chang Gung Univ, Grad Inst Clin Behav Sci, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
关键词
Minimal detectable change; Clinically important difference; Outcome measures; Upper extremity; Stroke rehabilitation; Wolf Motor Function Test; INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION; MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE; KINEMATIC ANALYSIS; EXCITE TRIAL; RESPONSIVENESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RECOVERY; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/1545968308331144
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. This study aimed to establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) and clinically important differences (CID) of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) in patients with stroke, and to assess the proportions of patients' change scores exceeding the MDC and CID after stroke rehabilitation. Methods. A total of 57 patients received 1 of the 3 treatments for 3 weeks and underwent clinical assessments before and after treatment. The MDC, at 90% confidence (MDC90), was calculated from the standard error of measurement to indicate a real change for individual patients. Anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were used to triangulate the values of minimal CID. The percentages of patients exceeding the MDC and minimal CID were also examined. Results. The MDC90 of the WMFT was 4.36 for the performance time (WMFT time) and 0.37 for the functional ability scale (WMFT FAS). The minimal CID ranged from 1.5 to 2 seconds on the WMFT time and from 0.2 to 0.4 points on the WMFT FAS. The MDC and CID proportions ranged from 14% to 30% on the WMFT time and from 39% to 65% on the WMFT FAS, respectively. Conclusions. The change score of an individual patient has to reach 4.36 and 0.37 on the WMFT time and WMFT FAS to indicate a real change. The mean change scores of a stroke group on the WMFT time and WMFT FAS should achieve 1.5 to 2 seconds and 0.2 to 0.4 points to be regarded as clinically important changes. Furthermore, the WMFT FAS may be more responsive than the WMFT time based on the results of proportions exceeding the threshold criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 434
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in Stroke Patients
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Fu, Tiffany
    Wu, Ching-yi
    Wang, Yen-ho
    Liu, Jung-sen
    Hsieh, Ching-ju
    Lin, Shih-fan
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2010, 24 (05) : 486 - 492
  • [2] Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the sitting balance scale and function in sitting test in people with stroke
    Alzyoud, Jehad
    Medley, Ann
    Thompson, Mary
    Csiza, Linda
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (02) : 327 - 336
  • [3] Minimal Detectable Change Scores for the Wolf Motor Function Test
    Fritz, Stacy L.
    Blanton, Sarah
    Uswatte, Gitendra
    Taub, Edward
    Wolf, Steven L.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2009, 23 (07) : 662 - 667
  • [4] Minimal detectable change and minimal clinically important difference in spinal muscular atrophy patients
    Vazquez-Costa, Juan F.
    Hervas, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : E40 - E41
  • [5] Assessing the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life for Outcome Measurement in Stroke Rehabilitation: Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Fu, Tiffany
    Wu, Ching-yi
    Hsieh, Ching-ju
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2011, 9
  • [6] Assessing the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life for Outcome Measurement in Stroke Rehabilitation: Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference
    Keh-chung Lin
    Tiffany Fu
    Ching-yi Wu
    Ching-ju Hsieh
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9
  • [7] Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Minimal Detectable Change
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 44 (12): : E1 - E1
  • [8] Construct validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in individuals receiving stroke rehabilitation
    Wu, Sz-Yan
    Li, Yi-Chun
    Chen, Yu-Wen
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Pan, Hsiao-Chieh
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Lau, Hiu-Ying
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (25) : 6195 - 6203
  • [9] Clinically Important Difference of the Arm Motor Ability Test in Stroke Survivors
    Fulk, George
    Martin, Rebecca
    Page, Stephen J.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2017, 31 (03) : 272 - 279
  • [10] The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 63 (07) : 804 - 805