Emergy evaluation of the contribution of irrigation water, and its utilization, in three agricultural systems in China

被引:16
|
作者
Chen, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Zhaohui [3 ]
Webber, Michael [2 ]
Chen, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Weiguang [4 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Key Lab Efficient Irrigat Drainage & Agr Soil Wat, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Resource Management & Geog, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
emergy; evaluation; irrigation; agriculture; sustainability; EVALUATION PERSPECTIVES; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WASTE-WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; INDEXES; BRAZIL; FARMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11707-013-0394-7
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Emergy theory and method are used to evaluate the contribution of irrigation water, and the process of its utilization, in three agricultural systems. The agricultural systems evaluated in this study were rice, wheat, and oilseed rape productions in an irrigation pumping district of China. A corresponding framework for emergy evaluation and sensitivity analysis methods was proposed. Two new indices, the fraction of irrigation water (FIW), and the irrigation intensity of agriculture (IIA), were developed to depict the contribution of irrigation water. The calculated FIW indicated that irrigation water used for the rice production system (34.7%) contributed more than irrigation water used for wheat (5.3%) and oilseed rape (11.2%) production systems in a typical dry year. The wheat production with an IIA of 19.0 had the highest net benefit from irrigation compared to the rice (2.9) and oilseed rape (8.9) productions. The transformities of the systems' products represented different energy efficiencies for rice (2.50E + 05 sej center dot J(-1)), wheat (1.66E + 05 sej center dot J(-1)) and oilseed rape (2.14E + 05 sej center dot J(-1)) production systems. According to several emergy indices, of the three systems evaluated, the rice system had the greatest level of sustainability. However, all of them were less sustainable than the ecological agricultural systems. A sensitivity analysis showed that the emergy inputs of irrigation water and nitrogenous fertilizer were the highest sensitivity factors influencing the emergy ratios. Best Management Practices, and other agroecological strategies, could be implemented to make further improvements in the sustainability of the three systems.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 337
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emergy evaluation of the contribution of irrigation water, and its utilization, in three agricultural systems in China
    Dan Chen
    Zhaohui Luo
    Michael Webber
    Jing Chen
    Weiguang Wang
    [J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2014, 8 : 325 - 337
  • [2] Emergy Evaluation of a Production and Utilization Process of Irrigation Water in China
    Chen, Dan
    Luo, Zhao-Hui
    Chen, Jing
    Kong, Jun
    She, Dong-Li
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2013,
  • [3] Emergy evaluation of a pumping irrigation water production system in China
    Dan CHEN
    Zhaohui LUO
    Michael WEBBER
    Jing CHEN
    Weiguang WANG
    [J]. Frontiers of Earth Science., 2014, 8 (01) - 141
  • [4] Emergy evaluation of a pumping irrigation water production system in China
    Chen, Dan
    Luo, Zhaohui
    Webber, Michael
    Chen, Jing
    Wang, Weiguang
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2014, 8 (01) : 131 - 141
  • [5] Emergy evaluation of a pumping irrigation water production system in China
    Dan Chen
    Zhaohui Luo
    Michael Webber
    Jing Chen
    Weiguang Wang
    [J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2014, 8 : 131 - 141
  • [6] Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management
    Martin, JF
    Diemont, SAW
    Powell, E
    Stanton, M
    Levy-Tacher, S
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 115 (1-4) : 128 - 140
  • [7] Emergy evaluation perspectives of an irrigation improvement project proposal in China
    Chen, Dan
    Webber, Michael
    Chen, Jing
    Luo, Zhaohui
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (11) : 2154 - 2162
  • [8] Sustainability evaluation of recycling in agricultural systems by emergy accounting
    Wang, Xiaolong
    Li, Zhejin
    Long, Pan
    Yan, Lingling
    Gao, Wangsheng
    Chen, Yuanquan
    Sui, Peng
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 117 : 114 - 124
  • [9] Integrated water quality, emergy and economic evaluation of three bioremediation treatment systems for eutrophic water
    Lu, Hongfang
    Yuan, Yaguang
    Campbell, Daniel E.
    Qin, Pei
    Cui, Lijuan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 69 : 244 - 254
  • [10] Emergy Evaluation of three Rice Wetland Farming Systems in the Taihu Lake Catchment of China
    Li, Jie
    Lai, Xin
    Liu, Hongmei
    Yang, Dianlin
    Zhang, Guilong
    [J]. WETLANDS, 2018, 38 (06) : 1121 - 1132