Emergy evaluation of the contribution of irrigation water, and its utilization, in three agricultural systems in China

被引:16
|
作者
Chen, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Zhaohui [3 ]
Webber, Michael [2 ]
Chen, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Weiguang [4 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Key Lab Efficient Irrigat Drainage & Agr Soil Wat, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Resource Management & Geog, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
emergy; evaluation; irrigation; agriculture; sustainability; EVALUATION PERSPECTIVES; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WASTE-WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; INDEXES; BRAZIL; FARMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11707-013-0394-7
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Emergy theory and method are used to evaluate the contribution of irrigation water, and the process of its utilization, in three agricultural systems. The agricultural systems evaluated in this study were rice, wheat, and oilseed rape productions in an irrigation pumping district of China. A corresponding framework for emergy evaluation and sensitivity analysis methods was proposed. Two new indices, the fraction of irrigation water (FIW), and the irrigation intensity of agriculture (IIA), were developed to depict the contribution of irrigation water. The calculated FIW indicated that irrigation water used for the rice production system (34.7%) contributed more than irrigation water used for wheat (5.3%) and oilseed rape (11.2%) production systems in a typical dry year. The wheat production with an IIA of 19.0 had the highest net benefit from irrigation compared to the rice (2.9) and oilseed rape (8.9) productions. The transformities of the systems' products represented different energy efficiencies for rice (2.50E + 05 sej center dot J(-1)), wheat (1.66E + 05 sej center dot J(-1)) and oilseed rape (2.14E + 05 sej center dot J(-1)) production systems. According to several emergy indices, of the three systems evaluated, the rice system had the greatest level of sustainability. However, all of them were less sustainable than the ecological agricultural systems. A sensitivity analysis showed that the emergy inputs of irrigation water and nitrogenous fertilizer were the highest sensitivity factors influencing the emergy ratios. Best Management Practices, and other agroecological strategies, could be implemented to make further improvements in the sustainability of the three systems.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 337
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emergy evaluation of cropping, poultry rearing, and fish raising systems in the drawdown zone of Three Gorges Reservoir of China
    Cheng, Hui
    Chen, Chundi
    Wu, Shengjun
    Mirza, Zakaria A.
    Liu, Zhimei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 144 : 559 - 571
  • [22] Using Reclaimed Water for Agricultural and Landscape Irrigation in China: a Review
    Wang, Zhen
    Li, Jiusheng
    Li, Yanfeng
    [J]. IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2017, 66 (05) : 672 - 686
  • [23] Irrigation technology and water rebound in China's agricultural sector
    Fang, Lin
    Wu, Fengping
    Yu, Yantuan
    Zhang, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (05) : 1088 - 1100
  • [24] Quantifying the sustainability of three types of agricultural production in China: An emergy analysis with the integration of environmental pollution
    Su, Yue
    He, Shan
    Wang, Ke
    Shahtahmassebi, Amir Reza
    Zhang, Leping
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhang, Min
    Gan, Muye
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252
  • [25] On the Evaluation of China's Rural Solar Energy Utilization Effects Based on Emergy Analyses
    Jia Linlin
    Zhang Xuehua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 EURO-ASIA CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND CSR: TOURISM, SOCIETY AND EDUCATION SESSION, PT II, 2017, : 239 - 246
  • [26] Integrated emergy, energy and economic evaluation of rice and vegetable production systems in alluvial paddy fields: Implications for agricultural policy in China
    Lu, Hongfang
    Bai, Yu
    Ren, Hai
    Campbell, Daniel E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 91 (12) : 2727 - 2735
  • [27] Emergy evaluation of positive and negative benefits of agricultural water use based on energy analysis of water cycle
    Gao, Meiyan
    Wu, Zening
    Guo, Xi
    Yan, Denghua
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 139
  • [28] Emergy evaluation of positive and negative benefits of agricultural water use based on energy analysis of water cycle
    Gao, Meiyan
    Wu, Zening
    Guo, Xi
    Yan, Denghua
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 139
  • [29] An Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process Method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of north China
    Sun, Haoyang
    Wang, Sufen
    Hao, Xinmei
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 179 : 324 - 337
  • [30] Evaluation of water resources utilization in the Yellow River Basin based on emergy water ecological footprint model
    Wang, Huiliang
    Li, Zhuocheng
    [J]. Water Resources Protection, 2022, 38 (01) : 147 - 152