Balancing adoption and affordability of medical devices in Europe

被引:48
|
作者
Schreyoegg, Jonas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baeumler, Michael [2 ]
Busse, Reinhard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Hlth Serv Management, D-80997 Munich, Germany
[2] Berlin Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Care Management, Berlin, Germany
[3] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, D-85758 Neuherberg, Germany
关键词
Medical devices; Resource allocation; Financing; Regulation; Europe; EXPENDITURE; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.03.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Dramatic increases in health expenditures have led to a substantial number of regulatory interventions in the markets for devices over the last years. However, little attention has been paid thus far to the regulation of medical devices and its effects. This article explores the policies pursued by European countries to find the right balance between improving access to new medical devices and restricting market forces to contain costs and ensure affordability. We outline the medical device policies of the four European countries with the largest expenditures on devices: Germany, France, Italy, and the UK. Subsequently, we discuss how these policies attempt to balance technological adoption and affordability by illustrating two case studies from Italy and Germany. We find that reference prices, if defined as maximum reimbursement levels, can help to achieve balance, because they are supposed to contain costs effectively, but do not necessarily act as a hurdle for the adoption of innovations. We also find that policy tools that encourage technological adoption should be used carefully since the benefits of a new technology are often difficult to predict. Finally, we draw a number of policy implications based on our observations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 224
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: Time for reform?
    A. J. M. Boulton
    S. Del Prato
    [J]. Diabetologia, 2012, 55 : 2295 - 2297
  • [32] Europe is updating rules on medical devices after implant fiasco
    Watson, Rory
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [33] Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: Time for reform?
    Boulton, A. J. M.
    Del Prato, S.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 (08) : 2295 - 2297
  • [34] Workshop Report "Medical Devices in Germany and Europe: quo vadis?"
    Perleth, Matthias
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2014, 108 (04): : 238 - 239
  • [35] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF MEDICAL DEVICES: ARE THERE LESSONS TO BE LEARNT FROM EUROPE
    Blueher, M.
    Davis, J. A.
    Mittard, V
    Torres, Torrejon R.
    Saunders, R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S315 - S315
  • [36] Hospital process performance and the adoption of medical devices: An organization-based view
    De Domenico, Francesca
    Noto, Guido
    Cinici, Maria Cristina
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [37] Adoption Decisions for Medical Devices in the Field of Cardiology: Results from a European Survey
    Hatz, Maximilian H. M.
    Schreyoegg, Jonas
    Torbica, Aleksandra
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Blankart, Carl R. B.
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 : 124 - 144
  • [38] A new framework for the design and adoption of home and patient-use medical devices
    Martin, Jennifer L.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS ERGONOMICS AND PATIENT SAFETY 2011: AN ALLIANCE BETWEEN PROFESSIONALS AND CITIZENS FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE, 2011, : 175 - 178
  • [39] The ACTH Quandary: Balancing Efficacy and Affordability for Infantile Spasms Treatment
    Aungaroon, Gewalin
    [J]. EPILEPSY CURRENTS, 2023, 23 (05) : 294 - 295
  • [40] Balancing Value with Affordability: Cell Immunotherapy for Cancer Treatment in the US
    Leech, Ashley A.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    Cohen, Joshua T.
    Jagasia, Madan
    Dusetzina, Stacie B.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2020, 25 (07): : E1117 - E1119