Balancing adoption and affordability of medical devices in Europe

被引:48
|
作者
Schreyoegg, Jonas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baeumler, Michael [2 ]
Busse, Reinhard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Hlth Serv Management, D-80997 Munich, Germany
[2] Berlin Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Care Management, Berlin, Germany
[3] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, D-85758 Neuherberg, Germany
关键词
Medical devices; Resource allocation; Financing; Regulation; Europe; EXPENDITURE; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.03.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Dramatic increases in health expenditures have led to a substantial number of regulatory interventions in the markets for devices over the last years. However, little attention has been paid thus far to the regulation of medical devices and its effects. This article explores the policies pursued by European countries to find the right balance between improving access to new medical devices and restricting market forces to contain costs and ensure affordability. We outline the medical device policies of the four European countries with the largest expenditures on devices: Germany, France, Italy, and the UK. Subsequently, we discuss how these policies attempt to balance technological adoption and affordability by illustrating two case studies from Italy and Germany. We find that reference prices, if defined as maximum reimbursement levels, can help to achieve balance, because they are supposed to contain costs effectively, but do not necessarily act as a hurdle for the adoption of innovations. We also find that policy tools that encourage technological adoption should be used carefully since the benefits of a new technology are often difficult to predict. Finally, we draw a number of policy implications based on our observations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 224
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Future of Medical Devices in Europe Is at Stake: Concerns over the Implementation of the Medical Devices Regulation 2017/745
    Albisinni, Simone
    Rassweiler, Jens
    van Poppel, Hendrik
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (03) : 191 - 192
  • [22] Transparency of clinical evidence for medical devices in Europe reply
    Fraser, Alan G.
    Butchart, Eric G.
    Szymanski, Piotr
    [J]. LANCET, 2019, 393 (10182): : 1693 - 1694
  • [23] The need for transparency of clinical evidence for medical devices in Europe
    Fraser, Alan G.
    Butchart, Eric G.
    Szymanski, Piotr
    Caiani, Enrico G.
    Crosby, Scott
    Kearney, Peter
    Van de Werf, Frans
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 392 (10146): : 521 - 530
  • [24] New regulations on medical devices in Europe: what to expect?
    Fouretier, Alice
    Bertram, Delphine
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2014, 11 (04) : 351 - 359
  • [25] Affordability of medical journal subscriptions
    Berer, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9428): : 24 - 24
  • [26] The truth behind "made in Europe" labels on medical devices
    Cohen, Deborah
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [27] New Regulations on Medical Devices in Europe: Are They an Opportunity for Growth?
    Maresova, Petra
    Hajek, Ladislav
    Krejcar, Ondrej
    Storek, Michael
    Kuca, Kamil
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [28] Pharmaceutical Policy Reform - Balancing Affordability with Incentives for Innovation
    Conti, Rena M.
    Rosenthal, Meredith B.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (08): : 703 - 706
  • [29] Balancing Housing Affordability and Transportation Efficiency in the Inland Empire
    Villalobos, Dorlins A.
    Carlos, Carolina
    Rasouli, Yasamin
    Leffew, Jordan M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2024: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, OPERATIONS, AND TRANSIT, ICTD 2024, 2024, : 242 - 251
  • [30] New medical uses of known medical devices - A new prespective on purpose-limited product protection for medical devices in Europe
    Schmidt, Thomas
    Oser, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2019, 14 (11) : 900 - 911