Environmental Tax, Polluting Plants' Strategies and Effectiveness: Evidence from China

被引:27
|
作者
He, Pan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Bing [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Sch Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, 2181 Samuel J LeFrak Hall,7251 Preinkert Dr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Sch Environm, Sch Govt, Room 228,163 Xianlin Ave, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; POLICY; ENFORCEMENT; INNOVATION; PROGRAM; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1002/pam.22052
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although environmental taxes have become a popular policy tool, their effectiveness for pollution control and impact on the compliance strategies of agents remains questionable. This research uses a quasi-experimental design to examine the effectiveness of the Pay for Permit policy, an environmental tax that has been imposed on water pollution emissions in Lake Tai Basin, Jiangsu, China, since 2009. A plant-level panel dataset from 2007 to 2010 is used for both difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-differences analyses to compare the pollution discharge, pollution abatement, and pollution generation of policy participants and control groups. The results indicate that treated plants reduce their emissions by about 40 percent after two years of the policy implementation. Thus, the policy generated approximately a 7 percent decrease in the industrial chemical oxygen demand emission in the entire Lake Tai Basin based on the emission level of 2007. Pollution is primarily reduced via end-of-pipe abatement instead of cleaner production. Our results show the effectiveness of environmental taxes in controlling industrial pollution, and indicate that the tax may not motivate the adoption of innovative techniques in the short term.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / +
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can environmental tax curb air pollution: evidence from China
    Li, Zheng
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (11) : 1449 - 1452
  • [32] Environmental and welfare effects of vehicle purchase tax: Evidence from China
    Ji, Qing
    Wang, Chunan
    Fan, Ying
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 115
  • [33] Environmental protection tax and firms' ESG investment: Evidence from China
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Ye, Yingying
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2024, 131
  • [34] Environmental regulation and corporate tax avoidance-Evidence from China
    Yang, Xiaokang
    Xu, Junbing
    Zhu, Minling
    Yang, Yinglong
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [35] Banking competition and the effectiveness of environmental regulations: Evidence from China
    Luo, Deming
    Kong, Junhao
    Wei, Xu
    Zhou, Mohan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 91 : 579 - 596
  • [36] Environmental Regulation, Compliance Strategies, and Productivity: Evidence from China
    Liu, Mengdi
    Shadbegian, Ron
    Zhang, Bing
    LAND ECONOMICS, 2022, 98 (01) : 41 - 61
  • [37] Environmental Regulation, Compliance Strategies, and Productivity: Evidence from China
    Liu, Mengdi
    Shadbegian, Ron
    Zhang, Bing
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2022, 37 (04) : 606 - 606
  • [38] Government environmental concerns and corporate green innovation: Evidence from heavy-polluting enterprises in China
    Chen, Jinyu
    Zhu, Dandan
    Ding, Shijie
    Qu, Jingxiao
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 33 (03) : 1920 - 1936
  • [39] Environmental regulation, trade openness and polluting emissions: City-level empirical evidence from China
    Hao, Fangjing
    Wu, Hui
    Liu, Junxian
    Chen, Yufei
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 32 (03): : 494 - 507
  • [40] How environmental regulations affect the development of green finance: Recent evidence from polluting firms in China
    Xu, Yong
    Li, Shanshan
    Zhou, Xiaoxiao
    Shahzad, Umer
    Zhao, Xin
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 189 : 917 - 926