Environmental Tax, Polluting Plants' Strategies and Effectiveness: Evidence from China

被引:27
|
作者
He, Pan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Bing [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Sch Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, 2181 Samuel J LeFrak Hall,7251 Preinkert Dr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Sch Environm, Sch Govt, Room 228,163 Xianlin Ave, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; POLICY; ENFORCEMENT; INNOVATION; PROGRAM; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1002/pam.22052
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although environmental taxes have become a popular policy tool, their effectiveness for pollution control and impact on the compliance strategies of agents remains questionable. This research uses a quasi-experimental design to examine the effectiveness of the Pay for Permit policy, an environmental tax that has been imposed on water pollution emissions in Lake Tai Basin, Jiangsu, China, since 2009. A plant-level panel dataset from 2007 to 2010 is used for both difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-differences analyses to compare the pollution discharge, pollution abatement, and pollution generation of policy participants and control groups. The results indicate that treated plants reduce their emissions by about 40 percent after two years of the policy implementation. Thus, the policy generated approximately a 7 percent decrease in the industrial chemical oxygen demand emission in the entire Lake Tai Basin based on the emission level of 2007. Pollution is primarily reduced via end-of-pipe abatement instead of cleaner production. Our results show the effectiveness of environmental taxes in controlling industrial pollution, and indicate that the tax may not motivate the adoption of innovative techniques in the short term.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / +
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China's Heavily Polluting Companies
    Lin, Zhouzhou
    Liang, Dezhi
    Li, Shengnan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [22] Sustainable corporate environmental information disclosure: Evidence for green recovery from polluting firms of China
    Long, Fengjiao
    Chen, Qin
    Xu, Lu
    Wang, Jian
    Vasa, Laszlo
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [23] Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China
    Nguyen, Thi H. H.
    Elmagrhi, Mohamed H.
    Ntim, Collins G.
    Wu, Yue
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (05) : 2313 - 2331
  • [24] Peer Effect on Environmental Information Disclosure: Evidence from High-polluting Industries in China
    Ji Z.
    Chen Z.
    Chen J.
    Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 16 (02) : 102 - 117
  • [25] Local government fiscal squeeze, environmental regulation and firms' polluting behavior: Evidence from China
    Peng, Fei
    Wang, Ling
    Peng, Langchuan
    Wu, Huaqing
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 125
  • [26] Green finance and corporate environmental responsibility: evidence from heavily polluting listed enterprises in China
    Ling He
    Tingyong Zhong
    Shengdao Gan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 74081 - 74096
  • [27] Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: Evidence from China's polluting industries
    Zheng, Dan
    Shi, Minjun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 141 : 295 - 304
  • [28] Corporate environmental information disclosure and tax avoidance: Evidence from China
    Gu, Yu
    Wang, Shanhui
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (11)
  • [29] Does environmental labeling exacerbate heavily polluting firms' financial constraints? Evidence from China
    Han Xiao
    KeMin Wang
    China Journal of Accounting Research, 2020, 13 (02) : 147 - 174
  • [30] Does environmental regulation affect stock price crash?-Evidence from polluting firms in China
    Xu, Gang
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 27 (01) : 1519 - 1543