Environmental Tax, Polluting Plants' Strategies and Effectiveness: Evidence from China

被引:27
|
作者
He, Pan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Bing [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Sch Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, 2181 Samuel J LeFrak Hall,7251 Preinkert Dr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Sch Environm, Sch Govt, Room 228,163 Xianlin Ave, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; POLICY; ENFORCEMENT; INNOVATION; PROGRAM; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1002/pam.22052
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although environmental taxes have become a popular policy tool, their effectiveness for pollution control and impact on the compliance strategies of agents remains questionable. This research uses a quasi-experimental design to examine the effectiveness of the Pay for Permit policy, an environmental tax that has been imposed on water pollution emissions in Lake Tai Basin, Jiangsu, China, since 2009. A plant-level panel dataset from 2007 to 2010 is used for both difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-differences analyses to compare the pollution discharge, pollution abatement, and pollution generation of policy participants and control groups. The results indicate that treated plants reduce their emissions by about 40 percent after two years of the policy implementation. Thus, the policy generated approximately a 7 percent decrease in the industrial chemical oxygen demand emission in the entire Lake Tai Basin based on the emission level of 2007. Pollution is primarily reduced via end-of-pipe abatement instead of cleaner production. Our results show the effectiveness of environmental taxes in controlling industrial pollution, and indicate that the tax may not motivate the adoption of innovative techniques in the short term.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / +
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do polluting plants locate in the borders of jurisdictions? Evidence from China
    Yang, Xin
    He, Canfei
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 50 : 140 - 148
  • [2] Board centrality and environmental disclosures: Evidence from the polluting Industries in China
    Li, Wenqin
    Benkraiem, Ramzi
    Ding, Rong
    Saadi, Samir
    Zhang, Ziyang
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2024, 60
  • [3] Environmental Protection tax and diversified transition of heavily polluting enterprises: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Ren, Yangqiu
    Hu, Guoliu
    Wan, Qing
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 81 : 1570 - 1592
  • [4] Tax incentives, environmental regulation and firms? emission reduction strategies: Evidence from China
    Qi, Yu
    Zhang, Jianshun
    Chen, Jianwei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 117
  • [5] The effects of the environmental protection tax law on heavily polluting firms in China
    Wen, Huwei
    Deng, Weifeng
    Guo, Quanen
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [6] The environmental benefit of tax enforcement: evidence from China
    Luo, Yu
    Zhang, Ming-ang
    Zhang, Sihan
    CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 17 (01) : 78 - 96
  • [7] Environmental regulation and green innovation: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China
    Guo, Mengmeng
    Wang, Huixin
    Kuai, Yicheng
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 53
  • [8] Environmental regulations and charitable donations made by polluting companies: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Kaixia
    Li, Weibing
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 93 : 1248 - 1267
  • [9] Environmental tax and highly polluting firms' green transformation: Evidence from green mergers and acquisitions
    Hu, Jun
    Fang, Qi
    Wu, Huiying
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 127
  • [10] The Golden Tax Project III and green innovation: evidence from heavily polluting enterprises in China
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Tian, Zongtao
    Chen, Zhibin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (17) : 49618 - 49631