DEVELOPMENT OF QUALITY INDICATORS FOR MENTAL HEALTHCARE IN THE DANUBE REGION

被引:5
|
作者
Lehmann, Isabell [1 ]
Chisholm, Dan [2 ]
Hinkov, Hristo [3 ]
Hoschl, Cyril [4 ]
Kapocs, Gabor [5 ,6 ]
Kurimay, Tamas [5 ]
Lecic-Tosevski, Dusica [7 ]
Nakov, Vladimir [3 ]
Rethelyi, Janos M. [8 ]
Winkler, Petr [9 ]
Zielasek, Juergen [1 ]
Gaebel, Wolfgang [1 ,10 ]
机构
[1] LVR Inst Healthcare Res, Cologne, Germany
[2] WHO, Reg Off Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Natl Ctr Publ Hlth & Anal, Sofia, Bulgaria
[4] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Klecany, Czech Republic
[5] Semmelweis Univ, St John Hosp, Teaching Dept, Buda Family Ctr Mental Hlth Ctr,Dept Psychiat & P, Budapest, Hungary
[6] Semmelweis Univ, Inst Behav Sci, Budapest, Hungary
[7] Serbian Acad Arts & Sci, Inst Mental Hlth, Belgrade, Serbia
[8] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
[9] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Dept Social Psychiat, Klecany, Czech Republic
[10] Heinrich Heine Univ, Med Fac, Dept Psychiat, LVR Klinikum, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
mental healthcare; psychiatry; quality indicator; quality assurance; quality management; health system performance; Danube region; EPA GUIDANCE; FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.24869/psyd.2018.197
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Quality indicators are quality assurance instruments for the evaluation of mental healthcare systems. Quality indicators can be used to measure the effectiveness of mental healthcare structure and process reforms. This project aims to develop quality indicators for mental healthcare systems in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Serbia to provide monitoring instruments for the transformation of mental healthcare systems in these countries. Methods: Quality indicators for mental healthcare systems were developed in a systematic, multidisciplinary approach. A systematic literature study was conducted to identify quality indicators that are used internationally in mental healthcare. Retrieved quality indicators were systematically selected by means of defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality indicators were subsequently rated in a two-stage Delphi study for relevance, validity and feasibility (data availability and data collection effort). The Delphi panel included 22 individuals in the first round, and 18 individuals in the second and final round. Results: Overall, mental healthcare quality indicators were rated higher in relevance than in validity (Mean relevance=7.6, SD=0.8; Mean validity=7.1, SD=0.7). There was no statistically significant difference in scores between the four countries for relevance (X-2(3)=3.581, p=0.310) and validity (X-2(3)=1.145, p=0.766). For data availability, the appraisal of "YES" (data are available) ranged from 6% for "assisted housing" to 94% for "total beds for mental healthcare per 100,000 population" and "availability of mental health service facilities". Conclusion: Quality indicators were developed in a systematic and multidisciplinary development process. There was a broad consensus among mental healthcare experts from the participating countries in terms of relevance and validity of the proposed quality indicators. In a next step, the feasibility of these twenty-two indicators will be evaluated in a pilot study in the participating countries.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 206
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of healthcare quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis in Europe: the eumusc.net project
    Petersson, Ingemar F.
    Strombeck, Britta
    Andersen, Lene
    Cimmino, Marco
    Greiff, Rolf
    Loza, Estibaliz
    Scire, Carlo
    Stamm, Tanja
    Stoffer, Michaela
    Uhlig, Till
    Woolf, Anthony D.
    Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 (05) : 906 - 908
  • [32] Healthcare system quality indicators: the complexity perspective
    Horvat, Ana
    Filipovic, Jovan
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2020, 31 (1-2) : 161 - 177
  • [33] Financial indicators in healthcare quality management systems
    Sedevich-Fons, Leonardo
    [J]. TQM Journal, 2014, 26 (04): : 312 - 328
  • [34] Uncovering the gap: Coeliac disease knowledge among healthcare professionals in the Danube region
    Riznik, Petra
    Carnohorski, Ida
    Dolinsek, Jasmina
    Dragutinovic, Natasa
    Gyimesi, Judit
    Hauer, Almuthe Christine
    Klemenak, Martina
    Korponay-Szabo, Ilma Rita
    Krencnik, Tomaz
    Masic, Mario
    Misak, Zrinjka
    Pavkov, Vesna
    Popp, Alina
    Raba, Tatiana
    Szitanyi, Peter
    Dolinsek, Jernej
    [J]. BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [35] Evaluation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality pediatric quality indicators
    Scanlon, Matthew C.
    Harris, J. Mitchell
    Levy, Fiona
    Sedman, Aileen
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2008, 121 (06) : E1723 - E1731
  • [36] Quality Assurance in German Mental Healthcare
    Grossimlinghaus, I.
    Gaebel, W.
    Janssen, B.
    Zielasek, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 30
  • [37] Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations and Their Ratios as Indicators of Water Quality and Eutrophication of the Hydro-System Danube-Tisza-Danube
    Savic, Radovan
    Stajic, Milica
    Blagojevic, Bosko
    Bezdan, Atila
    Vranesevic, Milica
    Jokanovic, Vesna Nikolic
    Baumgertel, Aleksandar
    Kovacic, Marina Bubalo
    Horvatinec, Jelena
    Ondrasek, Gabrijel
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [38] Measuring the intensity of mental healthcare: development of the Mental Healthcare Intensity Scale (MHIS)
    Beckers, Thijs
    Koekkoek, Bauke
    Tiemens, Bea
    Hutschemaekers, Giel
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [39] Development of Mental Health Indicators in Korea
    Han, Hyeree
    Ahn, Dong Hyun
    Song, Jinhee
    Hwang, Tae Yeon
    Roh, Sungwon
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 9 (04) : 311 - 318
  • [40] Measuring the intensity of mental healthcare: development of the Mental Healthcare Intensity Scale (MHIS)
    Thijs Beckers
    Bauke Koekkoek
    Bea Tiemens
    Giel Hutschemaekers
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 23